Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato
The Enterprise, is not space worthy, because it was used for stress and vibration testing, which was so rigorous, that the airframe was damaged beyond repair.
489 posted on 02/04/2003 3:03:01 PM PST by Pres Raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]


To: Pres Raygun
The Enterprise, is not space worthy, because it was used for stress and vibration testing, which was so rigorous, that the airframe was damaged beyond repair.

It is also the oldest of the lot. I suppose that it could be rebuilt, but it would take longer and be more expensive than just building a new orbiter. It does not seem terribly smart to start building another shuttle "from scratch" when the design can obviously be improved. I forget... was Enterprise ever "flown" to a landing after being carried aloft, or did it only ride on the Shuttle Transport aircraft?

490 posted on 02/04/2003 3:37:03 PM PST by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies ]

To: Pres Raygun
The Enterprise, is not space worthy, because it was used for stress and vibration testing, which was so rigorous, that the airframe was damaged beyond repair.

My understanding was that it was never intended to be spaceworthy and all the folks who petitioned and harranged NASA to name the first shuttle "Enterprise" were sorely disappointed, not to mention PO'd. I fell into the latter category myself.

492 posted on 02/04/2003 4:33:28 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson