Replies

Last I looked, California voters chose a Democrat to run this state, not the Vatican.

Fine. And if that democrat wants to support the wholesale, industrialized slaughter of the untermenchen, he should at least have the decency to quit pretending to be Catholic.

Defense of the indefensible has been a plank in the despotic democrat party for too long. It is time to call them what they are, the pro-death party. Science tells us that an individual human life begins at conception and continues along a continuum hallmarked by ages defined by form and function of the individual's body at each stage in development. Is an embryo, for instance, conscious? No, but it is perfectly adapted to continue its life in the nevironmant where it resides and grows ... and that is the essence of form and function defining the ages of an individual lifetime.

Specious terms such as 'potential life' or 'non-sentient individual life' or 'fertilized ovum' are used to dehumanize the individuals to be exploited. Any interruption of life support along the continuum begun at conception that doesn't allow the individual to continue growth and development is the act of killing a unique individual human. Feticide is one such interruption that the democrat party, in order to gain votes, has championed as a woman's right while totally (death is pretty total disenfranchisement) disenfranchising the other individual human life existing in the woman's body. In reality, what the democrat party advocates is unequal rights and disenfranchising one group of invidiual humnas in favor of empowering a group who will vote blindly for the democrats.

Attack the democrat ghouls? Shucks, I want to throw them out of office in a landslide electorate statement!