I'm not sure why you're so convinced that "who brought it up" is the important thing here. To me the important thing is that you've implied quite clearly that it's inconsistent or hypocritical to be against the Yugo war but not an Iraq war, and after repeated attempts to get you to back up your statement, you still have not. I couldn't care less that you "didn't bring it up". You may not have "brought it up" but you piled on, didn't you?
I merely point out that unqualified inconsistency can occur from either viewpoint.
You lost me. Where is the part where you either finally back up your statement, or disavow it? I'm patient, I can wait.
What proof do you want?
The notion that those who categorically support Bush and his efforts--let's call them GOP lemmings, or anti-Dem Party lemmings, if you prefer--(war or otherwise) while categorically castigating Clinton and his are just as hypocritical as those who categorically supported Clinton and his efforts--let's call them Dem Party lemmings, or anti-GOP lemmings, if you prefer--(war or otherwise) while categorically castigating Bush and his stands on its own merit.
Condensed, lemmings for both parties are hypocrites.
If you are having trouble understanding this, then I would kindly suggest you remove your GOP blinders.
What does this mean? Just let me know when you're ready to back down from your irresponsible statement, ok?
What proof do you want?
"Proof" of what? I just want you to admit that you can't support your irresponsible statement, which (if you were reasonably honorable) you would have by now.
If you are having trouble understanding this, then I would kindly suggest you remove your GOP blinders.
You're full of it, and I'm through with you.