Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brett66
OK, so that looks like the old DynaSoar vehicle attached to the tip of some kind of Saturn-class booster. Basically the flying bathtub concept (lifting body). The reusability of the different parts would have to be determined.

Remember the original selling point of the shuttle was the concept that essentially everything could be re-used and thereby saving the costs of fabricating a new vehicle for each mission. Can the proposed systems do that? If not, they'll come in for the same criticism as the launch systems of the mid 1960s. The bean counters will hammer them to death.

40 posted on 02/03/2003 7:39:34 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: chimera
Gawd, I hate the bean counters. But you're right, one has to live within one's means.

The Saturn V was a monster, but you're right, it would be the only way to go. And you're also right about the fact that the SV is a big, disposable monster as well. You couldn't just dump it in the ocean, either, as it would have to push the Shuttle high enough so that it would burn up on reentry from a low orbit.

The Enterprise had a booster cover, if you'll recall. One could probably remove the valves, then cover the ass end with the aerodynamic cover.

Speaking of which, do you think they'll have to pull Enterprise out of mothballs? At least to cover the shuttle missions that need to go up in future.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

41 posted on 02/04/2003 4:22:46 AM PST by section9 (The girl in the picture is Major Motoko Kusanagi from "Ghost In the Shell". Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson