Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton & NASA's Fall: Is Bill Clinton responsible for the Columbia disaster?
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | February 3, 2003 | Lowell Ponte

Posted on 02/03/2003 6:04:09 AM PST by SJackson

PONTEFICATIONS

AS WE WATCHED SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIA’S FIREBALL falling earthward Saturday on America’s news channels, my wife Ellen said, "Well, at least we can assume that no more space shuttles will be given names that begin with the letter ‘C.’ Seven astronauts died aboard the Challenger in 1986. And now seven more have died aboard the Columbia."

Scientists in their rational minds reject all such notions of jinxes, bad omens and superstition. But I remembered when, as Roving Editor for Reader’s Digest, I was among those who might have been selected "the first journalist in space." Scientists like other human beings have emotions, and I would today feel uneasy stepping on board a third shuttle with a name such as the U.S.S. Jimmy Carter.

"One good thing about this," I told her. "We’ll probably never have a shuttle or other American spaceship named after Bill or Hillary Clinton."

Nor should we. The Clinton Administration did more than gut America’s defense budgets and devastate our military as no foreign enemy has ever done, tempting terrorists to exploit our weakness.

Presidents Bill and Hillary did more than choke off America’s intelligence budget, greatly reducing our ability to detect what potential enemies were preparing to do to our World Trade Center and Pentagon. Bill and Hillary Clinton deserve a large share of responsibility for the destruction of the World Trade Center and the deaths of more than 3,000 Americans on September 11, 2001.

The Clintons also targeted NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, for massive budget cuts. They left our space program so damaged that American companies turned instead to Communist China to launch their satellites – and in the process apparently transferred vast amounts of classified rocket technology know-how to China’s ruling Red Army.

Communist China thereafter, of course, rewarded the Clintons by buying America’s Democratic Party with many brown paper bags filled with millions of dollars in cash. Today, as a result, we should regard the Democrats no longer as an "American" political party, but as the wholly-owned subsidiary of a foreign power.

But what share of blame should the Clintons bear for Saturday’s tragic loss of space shuttle Columbia and its brave crew?

By 1995 the Federal Government’s General Accounting Office (GAO) had begun what would be repeated warnings that Draconian Clinton cuts in NASA’s shuttle workforce budget could pose risks by overworking those who maintain, repair and fly the shuttle fleet. GAO noted a serious lack of needed NASA shuttle professionals in avionics, mechanical engineering and computer systems.

"The shuttle requires an awful lot of nursing," warned Charles Vick, space analyst for the Federation of American Scientists, noting that the GAO "says the potential for failure is still staring us in the face."

In the Clintons’ and Vice President Al Gore’s eagerness to cut America’s muscle at NASA so that taxpayer money could be redistributed to buy Democratic votes, the shuttle program plummeted from 3,000 federal workers in 1995 to only 1,800 in early 2000, when NASA’s hemorrhage was put on hold lest it become an election issue against Gore and the Democratic Party.

Under Clinton management, shuttle missions slowed to a trickle….except when one was needed to bribe Ohio Senator and former astronaut John Glenn with a free ride back into space as payment for Glenn’s obstruction of Senate investigation and impeachment proceedings against President Clinton. Defective missions to Mars and the Moon were evidence of the mess created at NASA by Clinton operatives and policies.

Since Clinton’s departure, the damage left in his wake is taking time to repair. NASA’s accounting of taxpayer money was left in a "shambles," almost impossible to audit by either GAO or the private auditing firm PriceWaterhouseCoopers because NASA officials from the Clinton days have not provided auditors with needed documentation.

The International Space Station (ISS), where three space pioneers remain at risk as this is written, cost U.S. taxpayers at least $35 billion more than promised – despite Clinton Administration reductions in its proposed size and capacity that make the current space station unable to house most of the tools to do what scientists wanted it for.

Under the Clinton Administration, the Space Station became a black hole for money, sucking it not only out of taxpayer pockets but also out of the budgets of many other NASA missions and, the GAO has continued to warn, out of the budget to keep the space shuttle operating safely. Clinton NASA budget numbers for the ISS proved to be "not credible."

Were the Clintons in significant measure responsible for the downfall of both Shuttle Columbia and, in a larger sense, NASA? Yes. The apparent Clinton agenda was to weaken all those things that made America strong.

Ironically, NASA should be downsized – or, better, completely privatized. NASA, despite the dedication and heroic efforts of thousands of its workers and astronauts, is a socialist institution. The wonder is that the Clintons did not love it more.

By its very nature, NASA monopolization of space for government is a violation of the deepest pioneering, free enterprise values of America.

What sane person wants to see the Moon, Mars – indeed the whole human future as we migrate into outer space – undertaken on NASA’s socialist model?

Russia, with its eagerness to sell private tourist tickets to the Space Station, has been more capitalistic than has America. NASA has tried to allocate space bureaucratically and politically, with precious shuttle seats given over the years to key lawmakers such as Senator Jake Garn (R.-Utah), now-Senator Bill Nelson (D.-Fla.) and Senator John Glenn (D.-Ohio). This column has discussed NASA’s socialism regarding both the Space Station and the future of the Moon and Mars.

As to the courageous astronauts who lost their lives Saturday aboard Columbia – could they have been victims of attack or terrorism? One of these heroes was the first Israeli in space, who saved us all by taking part in Israel’s preemption of the French Osirak nuclear reactor being built near Baghdad in 1981. This seems highly unlikely. In theory, however, heat-shield tiles on the underside of the Space Shuttle might have been tampered with.

And in theory, at least one foreign nation has weaponry that could have struck the Shuttle 200,000 feet above the Earth. This is Communist China, which has developed giant laser cannon designed to destroy or blind American military satellites, including the Global Positioning Satellites whose signals are now used to direct our cruise missiles to their targets. While a visible light beam from such cannon – fired from, e.g., a Chinese Cosco cargo ship along the West Coast – might be seen or photographed, the lasing technique can also be used to generate powerful beams of invisible energy such as microwaves. But the Peoples Republic of China has little or no motive – and certainly no reason to risk being detected – in this case.

The likely explanation is the one on which scientists are already focusing: that a corrupted left wing led to Columbia’s destruction. (Historians may someday find that the same thing destroyed America’s great, free eagle.)

As to these seven heroes, how best can we honor them? Such pioneers have always been the best among us. We should honor them by continuing and expanding space exploration, and by freeing it from government monopoly.

In the wake of Challenger’s explosion, we honored those seven astronauts by naming a "planet" for each of them – a memorial that will last many thousands of years wherever humans retain the current global naming system. These "planets" were seven asteroids circling the sun in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. The seven heroes of Columbia deserve the same long-lasting memorial – in global records and in our hearts.

President Bush seemed to say as much by quoting the Bible’s Book of Isaiah: "Lift your eyes and look to the heavens. Who created all these? He who brings out the starry hosts one by one, and calls them each by name. Because of His great power and mighty strength, not one of them is missing."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Ponte hosts national radio talk show Monday through Friday Noon-2 PM Eastern Time (9-11 AM Pacific Time) as well as on Saturdays 6-9 PM Eastern Time (3-6 PM Pacific Time) and on Sundays 9-11 PM Eastern Time (6-8 PM Pacific Time) on the Talk America network . Internet Audio worldwide is at TalkAmerica.com. The show's live call-in number is (888) 822-8255. A professional speaker, he is a former Roving Editor for Reader's Digest.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 02/03/2003 6:04:09 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This blaming Clinton for everything is getting old and taking on a new meaning in a comical sense hence missing the very serious misdeeds of Clinton.

This is another reason why the left still gets away with their "ITS OLD NEWS" garbage.

Frankly it is not helping our cause at all IMHO!

2 posted on 02/03/2003 6:09:49 AM PST by alisasny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Sorry, but you can't lay the blame on Clinton for this one. Bush has been president for over two years. The underfunding of NASA also occurred on his watch, which doesn't make either man guilty. It is just that our government is so bloated, so complex, and so overreaching that we simply have lost the ability to decide where the money should go to protect fellow citizens.
3 posted on 02/03/2003 6:11:56 AM PST by Galtoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It's for certain that Clinton did much damage. But, I sure hope we're not going to run against his administration in '04.
4 posted on 02/03/2003 6:13:36 AM PST by Types_with_Fist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
Clinton is responsible for many things (treason, multiple homicides, rape, perjury, bribery, the unabated growth of Al Queda, etc.), but this incident is not one where he should be held responsible.
5 posted on 02/03/2003 6:16:33 AM PST by TheExploited (Who was that John Galt guy anyway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
What about the GOPers in congress who didn't restore funding to NASA?
6 posted on 02/03/2003 6:18:55 AM PST by Karsus (TrueFacts=GOOD, GoodFacts=BAD))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Russia, with its eagerness to sell private tourist tickets to the Space Station, has been more capitalistic than has America

capitalism is the only economic system on earth. the difference is in the various ways of dividing up the ownership/property.

7 posted on 02/03/2003 6:27:02 AM PST by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheExploited
You get it. The FAR right constantly blames him for everything and he can literally turn around say that about something not so serious and say the KOOKS blamed me for that as well. By doing this over every single bad event we are pretty much planting the sead that he is INNOCENT of everything. He literally turns everying thing into the VRWC and we lose crediblity on everything. Its a very vicious cycle.
8 posted on 02/03/2003 6:28:36 AM PST by alisasny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid
FACT: The RATS in general hate the space program. Social programs are their only concern.

FACT: NASA was greatly diminished under Clinton's watch.

FACT: Clinton may not deserved all of the blame, but none of it?

FACT: GWB has been a little busy. 9/11 happened within 8 months of his presidency. I think he had big plans for the space agency before he got sidetracked.
9 posted on 02/03/2003 6:31:08 AM PST by BushCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I'm looking forward to the thread titled "WWII: Its all Clinton's fault!"

Seriously, in the late 80's and early 90's, NASA needed something to justify its existence, and came up with the current ISS plan -- this also justified the Shuttle's existence. Both are married to each other....becuase the Shuttle is an outdated piece of machinery.

If the agency were forward thinking, it would be looking into getting to Mars or beyond, not blowing money on the ISS and the shuttle....

10 posted on 02/03/2003 6:43:40 AM PST by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Any Freeper have the actual budget numbers 90 thru present?
11 posted on 02/03/2003 6:46:04 AM PST by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Sorry, but you can't blame ze Klinton for this and I have been excoriating people blaming Bush. Flying at 11,000 mph is a very dangerous thing, you know.
12 posted on 02/03/2003 6:46:22 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
The damage the Clintons did to our country during their 8 year reign
of corruption may never be completely repaired.
I will never forgive, OR forget.

The Clintons also targeted NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, for massive budget cuts. They left our space program so damaged that American companies turned instead to Communist China to launch their satellites – and in the process apparently transferred vast amounts of classified rocket technology know-how to China’s ruling Red Army.

In the Clintons’ and Vice President Al Gore’s eagerness to cut America’s muscle at NASA so that taxpayer money could be redistributed to buy Democratic votes, the shuttle program plummeted from 3,000 federal workers in 1995 to only 1,800 in early 2000, when NASA’s hemorrhage was put on hold lest it become an election issue against Gore and the Democratic Party.
13 posted on 02/03/2003 7:07:27 AM PST by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
As much I hate Clinton, this is the wrong thing to pin him on. In fact it is getting imho and it hurts our cause.
14 posted on 02/03/2003 7:10:20 AM PST by KevinDavis (Marsward Ho!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ContemptofCourt
I think in 84 Reagan proposed a space station. Much grander than the one that is being built.
15 posted on 02/03/2003 7:11:59 AM PST by KevinDavis (Marsward Ho!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
There is a great book called "Dragonfly" about the shuttle program, MIR, and the ISS....apparently, the current ISS was presented to congress and Bush I (I believe) to support funding for NASA....the original version of the space station was something much more grand (but its costs ballooned to an unfathomable figure).
16 posted on 02/03/2003 7:21:57 AM PST by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I am Clintoon hater from the first time I heard his name and saw his smirking face, but this thread and others like it are ridicolous.Even if you pin anything on him, it would not affect him, for he no remorse for any of his actions.He is amoral.
17 posted on 02/03/2003 7:30:57 AM PST by retiredtexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny; Galtoid
This blaming Clinton for everything is getting old and taking on a new meaning in a comical sense hence missing the very serious misdeeds of Clinton.

True true! Clinton may have done a number of things that were not right for the nation ...however blaming him for everything that goes wrong is a stretch.

18 posted on 02/03/2003 7:32:40 AM PST by spetznaz (When i say i am perfect people say i am arrogant .....but i am just being darn honest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz; All
Is clinton responsible for this horrible tragedy? Of course not.
Did his 8 years in office irreparably harm the infrastructure
of America (including the space program)? Absolutely.
19 posted on 02/03/2003 7:38:48 AM PST by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
"I think in 84 Reagan proposed a space station. Much grander than the one that is being built."

He also proposed putting a man on Mars. If it happened, he'd get credit (like JFK did,) and if it didn't no one (but me) would remember.
20 posted on 02/03/2003 8:03:33 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson