To: conservativecorner; AlabamaRebel; Joy Angela; Matt Drudge; Carl/NewsMax; Judicial Watch; ...
2 posted on
02/03/2003 6:11:58 AM PST by
ALOHA RONNIE
( ..Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LzXRay.com .)
To: conservativecorner
I never miss a Charles Krauthammer column. Thanks for posting it.
3 posted on
02/03/2003 6:20:51 AM PST by
Carolinamom
(I was determined to know beans.......Henry David Thoreau)
To: conservativecorner
PRIVATIZE THE SPACE INDUSTRY NOW!
firstly, space exploration is not a legitimate function of government. secondly, it is far less efficient for this to be run by the government then by private industry.
4 posted on
02/03/2003 6:44:24 AM PST by
bc2
To: conservativecorner
How about the government offers a $10 billion prize for the first Mars rocks returned to earth?
Let private industry handle the rest, with low cost leases of NASA facilities.
To: conservativecorner
Do you think the sheeple will mind very much that the first transmissions from Mars Base 1 are going to be in Chinese?
To: conservativecorner
Then, astonishingly, it took only 66 to get from Kitty Hawk to the moon. And then, still more astonishingly, we lost interest, spending the remaining 30 years of the 20th century going around in circles in low earth orbit, i.e., going nowhere. Amazing but true statement, I am afraid tough it may take another space race to get us to Mars, if there was not for Soviet Union, we would never be on the moon, but there is no competitor now so nobody but dreamers give a damn about Mars.
To: conservativecorner
Bump.
I'm ready, send me.
Blacksmiths in Spaaaaaaaaace!
16 posted on
02/03/2003 4:56:23 PM PST by
tet68
To: conservativecorner
Can I go too? Pretty please?
Even if I can't personally go, humans should go to Mars. It's the kind of thing we do.
19 posted on
02/03/2003 5:09:08 PM PST by
LibKill
(ColdWarrior. I stood the watch.)
To: conservativecorner
Going to Mars would be cool and all that, but what do we do after we go there? We didn't have an answer to this question after Apollo. The same thing will happen again. We need an economical exploration infrastructure to make routine human planetary exploration possible, flags and footprints aren't going to cut it.
22 posted on
02/03/2003 5:22:26 PM PST by
Brett66
To: conservativecorner
If the Moon were made of gold {or name your exotic element/material: platinum, plutonium, diamonds...}, it would not be worth the cost of traveling to get to it. The Moon, Mars, the Asteroids, The Galilean Satellites are all rocks - nothing but rocks. Columbus did not sail to a new world made of nothing but rock, containing nothing but rock, across a desert ocean of acid, poison, lava, withering radiation, insanely hot magnetic belts and not to mention a freakish vacuum in massive ships made of gold paddled tediously with oars of diamonds the size of popsicle sticks.
To: conservativecorner
39 posted on
03/18/2007 9:29:11 AM PDT by
ALOHA RONNIE
("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
To: All
IMO let's not waste much time or $$$ on the Moon - the arguments that it is essential for defense, or is a particularly important industrial site are flawed. It has not been proven that sufficient water ice (if any) is there to sustain a rocket refueling station for very long. Mars is a suitable target because of its atmosphere, water ice and rich geology of great interest to an important scientific lobby - the biological sciences.
40 posted on
03/18/2007 9:34:25 AM PDT by
Fitzcarraldo
(If the Moon didn't exist, people would have traveled to Mars by now.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson