Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SarahW
One fragile tile snaps off and that all she wrote for crew and ship.

Thats NOT the case. EVERY mission some tiles get damaged on launch or reentry. There is a certain amount of robustness in the system. Evidently THIS time some critical limit was exceeded.
272 posted on 02/03/2003 7:48:44 AM PST by Kozak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]


To: Kozak
That's not what I've been reading - loss of leading edge tiles have always put the ship at risk of catastophic failure, and they had no way to fix it, and no plan b to work around it, and didn't even want to see it, because there was nothing to be done about it.

Reminds me of something I read in an unrelated piece recently = if you don't have a hammer, you don't want anything to look like a nail.

I'm not ashamed to Monday-morning quarterback. If I had understood that "give up" and "no point in looking" was the plan in this sort of event, I would have been friday afternoon quarterbacking, too.

And for ***sakes, why don't they have a maneuverable tethered webcam to visualize all areas of the ship? It's 2003, not 1983. Robot arm, smobot arm. There were low weight, lower tech solutions to in-slight ship inspection.

The heat shield has always had an unacceptable high risk level. It was an achilles heel and everyone at NASA knew that, if I didn't.

And it is going to have to be redesigned and reengineered.
394 posted on 02/03/2003 8:46:40 AM PST by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson