[nopardons]

So, RLK gets papers published ? Where, in what, and so what ? Lots of people get articles and papers published, which are dead wrong,filled with errors, and are just plain junk.

In 1921, the unemplotment level was at 11.7%, in 1951, it was 3.3%, in 1961, 6.7%,in 1971, 5.9%,in 1981, 7.6%. There are hard, cold, actual figures for you, instead of your spurious, pulled out of thin air crap.

I'm not a " sheeple ", though it seems that YOU are. I have NO " keepers ". though it appears that YOU must have one or more. I don't live in a " cocoonm ", though it's obvious, that YOU live in cloud coo coo land of irrationality and bizarro nonsense& paranoia ! Since I graduated from school long before 1970, your ridiculous assertations , even IF ( which it isn't !) true, don't apply to me. Your claims are so far from being 100 % accurate, as to be worse than laughable. Facts don't matter to you at all; it's say anything, just to " prove " your point; which you have yet to do and can't. LOL

I am not a male, I am not a " sheeple ", I haven't been brainwashed ( unlike YOU ), I am not delusional ( unlike YOU ), and since you so enjoy personal attacks and name calling, it would behoove you, dear, to at least attempt to use facts, historical data, list your sources, and NOT to even try to engage in debate, your intellectual superiors. You're a mental midget, ill educated, ill mannered, unknowledgeable, and ridiculous.

Every nation, BUT the USA has, throught history, oppressed and enslaved its populace ? ARE YOU REALLY THIS IGNORANT OF WORLD HISTORY ? ARE YOU ? England stopped slavery before we did . The standard of living, here, was for most of our recorded history, at a far lower level, it was in many other places in the world. Slavery, indentured servitude, and tenant farming was, for a long time, part of our nation's standard of living. There were press gangs ( look that up; I'm sure you don't know what that is ), well into the 19th century here.

Want to see a grade A, #1 ignoramous ? Go look into the nearest mirror ! After many decades of actual study, do come back and give this another try, you pompous, arrogant, delsusional cretin.

[Red Jones]

why yes, RLK does get published. He's worked at different careers, but I think he was a college professor a few years ago before retirement. I think he taught economics. My memory fails me. I've only seen him published on a web site that I think publishes mainly college professors.

and maybe I should take your advice and systematically store information on my hard drive with sources so that I can show it to people. Perhaps I should not be an amateur propagandist any more and be more professional about it. But I remember seeing a chart in the WSJ that listed unemployment rates all the way back to 1870. I was shocked by it. The author was telling us in that article that after 1967 the unemployment rate was elevated on historical standards. He used the chart to prove this. It really opened my eyes. I see you quoted 1921 figure at 11.7%, you have that chart in front of you. And I remember that in 1920 it was 1.0% and it went all the way to 12 in just one year. It jumped around. But on average it was normally between 3.0 and 3.5% from 1870 to 1970 if we merely exclude the 1930-1945 period. We haven't seen it under 4.0% since before 1970. And before 1970 we never went more than 4 years with it not going under 4.0%. It's like night and day when you compare post-1970 to pre-1970 in unemployment numbers.

But I want to tell you also dear that you look ravishing tonight. I am forever captured by your beauty. It is my deepest disappointment in life that you don't like me.