Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to Propose Budget Increase for NASA ($500M for 2004)
REUTERS ^ | Sunday, February 2, 2003; 7:22 PM | Reuters

Posted on 02/02/2003 5:13:11 PM PST by Mark Felton

Bush to Propose Budget Increase for NASA


Reuters
Sunday, February 2, 2003; 7:22 PM

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush will propose a nearly $470 million boost in NASA's budget for fiscal 2004, an administration official said on Sunday, promising investigators would look into whether past cutbacks played any part in the space shuttle Columbia disaster.

The disaster has prompted calls for increased spending to upgrade the aging shuttle fleet and develop a new space plane. Columbia broke up over Texas on Saturday, killing all seven astronauts aboard, just 16 minutes before it was due to land in Florida.

While NASA's budget has been reduced over the past decade, a senior administration official said Bush would boost funding for the space agency by almost $470 million to $15.47 billion in his fiscal 2004 budget.

The budget, which will be released on Monday, does not include costs associated with Saturday's disaster.

The administration official would not give a breakdown of NASA's budget, so it was unclear if it would include additional money for the shuttle program or safety upgrades.

NASA's total budget for 2003 was $15 billion, a slight increase from the previous year.

The space shuttle program was budgeted at $3.208 billion for 2003, $75 million less than in 2002.

Asked if additional money for NASA would be needed, the official said: "A large increase has been planned. A large increase will be proposed and we will continue to work with Congress to determine what the right amounts should be."

The official said it was too soon to say whether the disaster was in any way connected to past cutbacks in the shuttle program.

"It is not clear to anybody what impact, if any impact, there was as a result of funding. This very well may have nothing to do with any funding concerns," the official said. "All of these, though, must be reviewed as part of the overall investigation."

Sen. Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat, told CNN the administration had been delaying safety upgrades on the space shuttle.

"That is inexcusable," said Nelson, who once flew on the shuttle.

"Although that delay and those upgrades, I don't think, has any connection with yesterday's tragedy. Ironically, out of this tragedy we will now probably see the safety upgrades sped up," Nelson added.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: federalbudget2004
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: dts32041
The president had already said he wanted a 4% increase in discretionary budgets like NASA's.

This has nothing to do with the crash.

21 posted on 02/02/2003 5:58:08 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Karsus
We should build a new replacement space transport system.

That and an extensive moon base, with eventual plans for Mars.

We need more advancing of the frontier, and less putting the first whoever in space, which seems to be one the primary missions of the shuttle program.

22 posted on 02/02/2003 6:17:15 PM PST by Mulder (Guns and chicks rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: HailColumbia
I don't think I would want to fly that bird. It has been a yard ornament for over 20 years and it was never designed for a real mission.

$500M is a waste. Too little to fix the problem and too much to throw at a defective program. It is not even enough to pay for a launch, much less a new shuttle, a replacement lab module, or R&D development. Put the change away and give it some thought. If we want a space program we are going to have to invest some real currency.
25 posted on 02/02/2003 7:07:32 PM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
C'mon guys, infrastructure and national defense, which is directly related to a healthy and vibrant space program, is one of the national government's few real responsibilities. Instead of roads, though, this infrastructure is straight up!

This conservative says that we should support NASA (AND private space flight) to the hilt!

26 posted on 02/02/2003 7:09:14 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Mark Felton
Go ahead and spend the money Mr. President, after you tell us what programs you're going to cut to pay for the increase.

If only there was a political party in this country which represented me.

28 posted on 02/02/2003 7:18:47 PM PST by onceone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
Space Shuttle Endeavour, the replacement orbiter for Space Shuttle Challenger , cost approximately $2.1 billion.

That was actually a good deal cheaper than the original estimates, because it was made primarily of replacement parts for other shuttles. We don't have the extra parts to do that now and still have enough parts for the rest of the fleet. So a new shuttle built to the same specs as the others would cost more since almost all the parts need to be fabricated.

29 posted on 02/02/2003 7:21:03 PM PST by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mulder; All
I agree whole-heartedly! A conservative should support anything which improves the national defense as much as the space program, specifically NASA, which, though a bloated bureacracy, is incredibly efficient in government terms. Compare NASA with any other government agency. Considering bang-per-buck, it has done more to advance science and technology (or any goal assigned to it) than virtually any other US government organization. Compare NASA's budget to DoD, DoS, etc. You'll be both amazed and disgusted.

What needs to be done for NASA, among other things, is:

1. Increase the scientist to bureaucrat ratio back above 1 to 1 to something more reasonable.

2. Free up private contractors to get involved in space industry. Change NASA from a Cerberus at the gates to a space-oriented FAA.

3. Improve science and technology funding by ending silly liberal social experiments and pork-barrel spending. The remaining 98% goes into a tax cut.

4. DO NOT END MANNED SPACE FLIGHT!!! Extend our explorations, and smack with smelly carp all liberals and conservatives who try to demonize NASA in some ill advised attempt at demogouery.

I'm sure we can think of others! ;o)

30 posted on 02/02/2003 7:22:48 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Eric5985
If we hope to have feet on the ground by 2015 we better be ready to launch by 2013. We would have ~10 years?!
31 posted on 02/02/2003 7:24:36 PM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
Roughly the cost of two B-2 Spirit bombers. Not bad for space vehicle, all things considred...and the space shuttle does suck! :o) Imagine what we could build with MODERN equipment!
32 posted on 02/02/2003 7:25:15 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Eric5985
Instead of spending billions on the wasteful "missile defense" shield (a "shield" that won't protect a single city and will increase the chance of nuclear war), we should be spending it on NASA.

Look, noob, the current public missile defense shield is not intended to stop a massive nuclear attack like Russia could make. It's intended to stop a few missiles like N. Korea will soon have the ability to launch. Even if only one missile is stopped, a whole lot of lives will be saved.

33 posted on 02/02/2003 7:25:52 PM PST by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII
ITA, the OV series should not be increased. I think new vehicles (which need to be made regardless of 2-1-03) should have technology and capabilites far above with the OV's were/are capable of.
34 posted on 02/02/2003 7:27:54 PM PST by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII
Also, I've been thinking the past couple hours, and I believe it's possible, maybe even likely that the President will make a Kennedyesque call to place a man on Mars and return him safely to the earth before the decade is out.

This is an administration of big ideas, and the wherewithal to make those ideas reality.

35 posted on 02/02/2003 7:31:07 PM PST by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
Perhaps we can combine the two and set up a space based Anti-ballistic missile program. Would it be cheaper to protect the country with a couple of orbital stations, or to build hundreds of ground bases?
36 posted on 02/02/2003 7:36:47 PM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: HailColumbia
problem with orbital missle defense is that its just gonna be lasers

Who says? A kinetic ABM device (like a simple iron shaft plowing into a warhead at a few hundred thousand MPH) can be just as effective as a thermal ABM device (like the laser you mentioned). I don't see why the former couldn't complement the latter as a back-up, at least.

38 posted on 02/02/2003 8:43:13 PM PST by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Crossbow Eel
"The Space program (And Shuttles) have provided the US with invaluable technology that has saved 10's of thousands of American GI's!"

What are you referring to?
39 posted on 02/02/2003 8:48:27 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Tang. They don't call it Agent Orange for nothing, you know. :)
40 posted on 02/02/2003 9:01:40 PM PST by altayann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson