Skip to comments.
CA: Bush's land giveaway
Sac Bee ^
| 2/2/03
| Bee Editorial Staff
Posted on 02/02/2003 3:40:13 PM PST by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:47:49 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The Bush administration has hijacked an 1866 law intended to help open the West. The uses that the administration now envisions for this law has the potential to ruin vast portions of the West.
Many of the state's signature landscapes -- Death Valley and the Mojave National Preserve -- could soon face claims from local governments demanding rights-of-way over these federal lands for new roads. On the Mojave preserve alone, San Bernardino County is pressing claims to 2,567 miles of rights-of-way, according to the Los Angeles Times.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; giveaway; land; rightsofway
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: NormsRevenge
FRom what I see from this article it looks like it is just a way to give SOME government entity land that is currently off limits to everyone. So where is the good in that?
I hate the enviro weenies but distrust government just as much.
At least the way it is now the no-nothing local governments can't use it either.... or so it appears from this article.
21
posted on
02/02/2003 7:25:04 PM PST
by
JSteff
(Use common sense and look at history first.)
To: okie01
I don't think they wanna hear what you've got to tell 'em... Really? See #16.
22
posted on
02/02/2003 7:30:49 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
To: NormsRevenge
Hurray for the Bush Administration. Can anyone imagine a Gore Administration doing this?
Was the the fight we fought in 2000 worth it?
23
posted on
02/02/2003 7:30:51 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: NormsRevenge
The liberals would rather we all live in 400 story skyscrapers to make it easier for the terrorists to kill us with one plane.
To: Carry_Okie
"Really? See #16." You might get a more positive response than you suspect. Especially if you suggest that the McClatchy family might be able to buy into Yosemite at a rockbottom price...
25
posted on
02/02/2003 8:00:29 PM PST
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
To: okie01
"
"On the theory that whatever gets the enviro-whackos lathered up is a good thing, I applaud the Bush administration. "
Heh, heh, heh... Agreed.
To: okie01; Carry_Okie; Grampa Dave; blackie; madfly; farmfriend
Somehow, I agree.....prolly a good conversation if a bit one sided.
www.azfire.org
It's up and running on all 7 cylinders. Press release for heber board is posted as is the FAQ.
Ping your buddies to take a look.
27
posted on
02/02/2003 8:42:50 PM PST
by
EBUCK
(....reloading....praparing to FIRE!!!)
To: marsh2; dixiechick2000; Helen; Mama_Bear; poet; Grampa Dave; doug from upland; WolfsView; ...
28
posted on
02/02/2003 8:50:56 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: farmfriend; EBUCK
WTG, EBUCK! That's great! Ping me if you have another fundraiser.
Thanks for the ping, farmfriend! This is terrific!
29
posted on
02/02/2003 9:09:31 PM PST
by
dixiechick2000
(Maybe the hokey pokey IS what it's all about...)
To: John Lenin
Agreed!!!!
The enviro-wackos want to keep everyone except themselves out of the forests and National Parks.
Save the trees ??? have you seen any of the redwood decks these people enjoy? They have two sets on rules; one for themselves and one for everyone else!
30
posted on
02/02/2003 9:21:49 PM PST
by
Peaches
To: NormsRevenge
The Clinton administration sought to limit this loophole by prohibiting the conversion of an unpaved Alaskan dogsled path into an asphalt highway. Oh yeah! The Clintons "let them eat cake" style of governing.
31
posted on
02/02/2003 9:25:06 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(Democrat - the abortion party!)
To: Carry_Okie
Such a pity when a government is so fickle that it doesn't stay bought! How are holders of competing mines at home and abroad going to make an ill-gotten buck through artificial shortages if the American people can maintain access to their property?
Zing goes the arrows of Carry right into the enviral Bee writer.
So much for all of the closed roads the past 20 years.
32
posted on
02/02/2003 9:40:32 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
To: Grampa Dave; okie01; farmfriend; EBUCK
Zing goes the arrows of Carry right into the enviral Bee writer. Lol, not quite. That one wasn't aimed at the Bee but at their customers. Here's a stinging shot aimed at the Bee:
The Nerve! A mere President pretends that he can ignore THE PRESS and blow off deals sold by the opposition! He think this gives him influence for sale? The nerve stepping onto our turf! How is the Bee going to sell its power to influence public opinion, if it can't intimidate the politicians into staying bought?
We'll show him!
33
posted on
02/02/2003 10:12:00 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
To: Carry_Okie
Yes, this is much better to insert into the squealing Bee pigs playing like journalist:
The Nerve! A mere President pretends that he can ignore THE PRESS and blow off deals sold by the opposition! He think this gives him influence for sale? The nerve stepping onto our turf! How is the Bee going to sell its power to influence public opinion, if it can't intimidate the politicians into staying bought?
34
posted on
02/02/2003 10:33:17 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
To: Grampa Dave
Or to put it more scuccinctly...
How dare a mere President do such a thing!
This is OUR democracy!
35
posted on
02/02/2003 10:42:40 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
To: NormsRevenge
" It will be up to the federal Interior Department to say yes or no to these rights-of-way requests. Given the interest of San Bernardino County alone, the department will soon be barraged with thousands upon thousands of them once the rule formally takes effect on Feb. 5. The more these rights-of-way easements are granted, the more it complicates the management of public lands."I don't think they get it. The grant was made in 1866. A "claim" or "application" is not needed. The Interior has no right to "approve" the right of way. It has ALREADY been granted. Use and establishment through use constitues acceptance of the 1866 offer. Any passage established and used after 1866 and before 1972 (FLPMA repeal)- or before withdrawal from public lands as a Park, Refuge or National Forest- constitues acceptance of the original 1866 Mining Law (later R.S. 2477) offer of grant.
Also, State law governs rights of way NOT federal.
36
posted on
02/02/2003 10:56:05 PM PST
by
marsh2
To: Carry_Okie
Why not auction National Parks? Why should the government hold a monopoly in the land entertainment business? Well, because That devalues all land for its natural value and helps set it up for development.
Name for us the private, profit driven company you'd like to see owning Yosemite. Maybe then you could get a 3rd story time-share on the banks of the Merced near the new shopping mall.
37
posted on
02/02/2003 11:04:29 PM PST
by
lewislynn
(Vindicated once again.)
To: JSteff
FRom what I see from this article it looks like it is just a way to give SOME government entity land that is currently off limits to everyone. I think you see it right...I can't believe everyone here puffing up, pounding their chests attacking the messenger without knowing the obvious. It was actually a big deal at the time.
The scam: Senator Dianne Feinstein - The California Desert Protection Act
The reason: THE GREAT GOLD HEIST
38
posted on
02/02/2003 11:35:25 PM PST
by
lewislynn
(Vindicated once again.)
To: Servant of the Nine
Even if your concerned about the enivornment,
the lands could sold off with contracts
to cover any valid environmental concerns.
The federal government should not own nearly
half the land in this country.
To: NormsRevenge
..in practical terms, he has declared open season on federal lands....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson