Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Jamieson
I don't think it was ice. It was insulation. Also, now the page from Greg Katnik will not open. It was a NASA page which outlined the foam changes and problems.
550 posted on 02/02/2003 8:30:33 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]


To: Jael
It was a December launch. I didn't think that they knew it was insulation for sure.
566 posted on 02/02/2003 10:57:13 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies ]

To: Jael
Did you notice the frost on the intertank area during ascent? It was very obvious.

Speaking of the intertank, people don't realize the importance of that structure. Let me explain a little.

You have two solid rocket boosters which are each pushing the intertank with millions of pounds of thrust. There is a huge 32' +/- long, 6' tall in cross section (IIRC) structural box beam going through it from side to side with a monoball on each side where the boosters push the tank, which in turn, pushes the orbiter. (The term "shuttle" refers to the boosters, tank, and orbiter.)

The beam transfers the thrust load from the boosters to the intertank. The intertank pushes the LOX tank (the pointy part of the tank), and "pulls" the LH2 tank behind it. The LH2 tank pushes the entire orbiter at the aft attach points.

That intertank is the very heart of the shuttle itself, structurally speaking. It must certainly flex somewhat as loads change due to wind shear and such.

576 posted on 02/03/2003 5:17:27 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson