To: fooman
http://ltp.arc.nasa.gov/space/team/journals/katnik/sts87-12-23.html
During the STS-87 mission, there was a change made on the external tank. Because of NASA's goal to use environmentally friendly products, a new method of "foaming" the external tank had been used for this mission and the STS-86 mission. It is suspected that large amounts of foam separated from the external tank and impacted the orbiter. This caused significant damage to the protective tiles of the orbiter.
172 posted on
02/02/2003 2:59:33 PM PST by
Jael
To: Jael
environmentally friendly productsThey'll kill us all before it's over.
To: Jael
I keep reading that about the tanks ..
I don't want to get the wrong impression but what does NASA mean by "environmentally friendly"
190 posted on
02/02/2003 3:04:28 PM PST by
Mo1
(I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
To: Jael
I think that it is you that brought this up yesterday. IF, IF this were true, it would be ironic that PC kills here.
195 posted on
02/02/2003 3:06:17 PM PST by
fooman
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson