[Camerican]

Is it now FR policy to ZOT non-political and arguably very relevant news stories simply because the contents don't mesh with a Bush-Can-Do-No-Wrong following? Would this article have been cut if there were more explicit references to the whole thing being Clinton's fault?

Let's save the ZOTs for the demo-rat B.S. Let the rest of us judge for ourselves if articles like this are worth believing.

Flame away, if you'all want.

[Admin Moderator]

It is not our policy to ZOT non-political and revelant stories. This is the third post of this thread and this person specifically posted this story as liberal troll. We see this everyday. There are two more exact stories posted that I know of.

Nasa chiefs 'repeatedly ignored' safety warnings

and

Nasa chiefs 'repeatedly ignored' safety warnings

[Karsus]

YES. That appears to be the new FR policy. The mods are turning FR into the GOP version of DU.