Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: redbaiter
It's too heavy and too complex to do the one job it absolutely must do successfully every time - get people to & from orbit - and do all the other things it's being asked to do - carry cargo, do science expiriments, push the ISS around etc. We need to get rid of this turkey and build a smaller, lighter people-carrier, and leave the cargo-hauling to some other, unmanned vehicle. If privatization is the way to do that, great.

Exactly. And at the same time, the "cargo carriers" could have been designed to become a part of the ISS.

115 posted on 02/02/2003 7:47:57 AM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: jackbill
I agree whole heartidly, but if we let them kill the shuttle without a replacement in production I'm afraid you'll never be able to sell it. If you think NASA has problems getting it's buget cut every year think what would happen if they had no heavy lift vehicle and no ISS.
125 posted on 02/02/2003 7:52:20 AM PST by tricky_k_1972
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: jackbill
And at the same time, the "cargo carriers" could have been designed to become a part of the ISS.


I thought they were: Several times I've lit on the NASA channel to see animation depicting compartments stacked in the payload being removed and inserted/added on to the ISS like tinkertoys.

284 posted on 02/02/2003 9:55:48 AM PST by onehipdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson