Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CWOJackson
3) She is not universally worshipped by Democrats. There are many within her own party who detest her. In effect, she would have the opposite force on traditionally Democrat voters; repressing their turn out.

Look, I'm not saying you're wrong, but who are these Democrats that detest her? I was surprised when Pat Moynihan endorsed Hillary on his way out the door. He had always shown typical upper crust disdain for the Clintons. Who are the prominent Dems that openly dislike her?

24 posted on 02/02/2003 1:36:09 AM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: O.C. - Old Cracker
You can start with the six Democrats who are openly running for the Presidency, who know exactly what she's about. Add to that Democratic Senators who have seniority but get short changed because of her; Senators have big egos and long memories.

The same Democrats who opposed giving Pelosi her position; the one's who know she's bad for their party.

25 posted on 02/02/2003 1:42:41 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Who are the prominent Dems that openly dislike her?

There are none... it could prove deadly. I think the Brit who wrote the article is pretty dead-on-balls.

HILLARY can't wait for 2008... she would have to win her senate seat in 2006. Definitely not a done deal.

HILLARY will be on the Rat ticket in 2004.

26 posted on 02/02/2003 2:23:46 AM PST by johnny7 (“You know, the children need me!” -HRC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson