Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Destro
It just looks more and more like the shuttle is an idea whose time has come and gone. NASA seems to evolved into a classic bureaucracy just trying to keep everyone employed.
30 posted on 02/01/2003 8:35:15 PM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
Nasa isn't just a self-serving bureaucracy, but will not serve its stated vision of exploration without losing the mindset which is being the focus on the Shuttle...the Astronaut Mystique.

By the mid-seventies, Nasa was run by astronauts wanting rides, not by scientists exploring space. After the Challenger disaster, astronauts resigned quickly because their hopes of a ride were gone for the foreseeable future. We will see something similar shortly.

If Nasa can't get back to focusing on exploration, instead of providing ponies for jockeys, I say shut it down completely.

Robotics have emerged by leaps and bounds--little cameras will make openheart surgery no longer open heart. If cameras can crawl around your body, why can't they crawl around Mars? We could send them to Mars by the dozens for what it costs to send John Glenn on a sentimental Shuttle journey. If we got these out of work IT engineers reeducated, the technical problems could be solved. THINK of the spinoffs! Right now, the ISS does experiments about the level of a high school science fair. Maintain the ISS as a future docking point for sending masses of unmanned craft into the solar system. So what if most of them fail? It'll still be cheaper than these pointless joyrides.

90 posted on 02/02/2003 9:44:08 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson