Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stefan Stackhouse
>>we have had two catastrophic failures now in around hundred flights (suggesting a catstrophic failure rate probability o!��5{��������50), and have now lost 40% of our five-vehicle fleet<<

And what is the engineering and production plan to deal with a loss rate of 1:50 flights?

The mission concepts of STS presumed a loss rate of 1:100,000 flights, not 1:50. There are no plans to produce a new orbiter every fifty flights-there are no plans to produce orbiters at all.

And there is no engineering program for a replacement.

Fly 'em until they're all gone, then leave space to the Chinese.

Is that really the plan?

122 posted on 02/02/2003 7:33:52 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble
...there are no plans to produce orbiters at all.

I thought I heard that each orbiter had a life expectancy of 100 flights. With a 5 vessel fleet and approx 5 launches per year (107 launches in 20 years), the Space Shuttle program was good for 100 years...or until something better comes along.

125 posted on 02/02/2003 7:51:59 PM PST by Xthe17th (FREE THE STATES. Repudiate the 17th amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson