Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
I already detailed above that they are in the wrong places. 'fusellage' is too wide and 'engines' are in the wrong place as well.
111 posted on 02/01/2003 11:07:03 PM PST by finnman69 (Bush Cheney 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: finnman69
I already detailed above that they are in the wrong places. 'fusellage' is too wide and 'engines' are in the wrong place as well.

Well, your details are unfortunately wrong.

The engines I referred to were the OMS engines, which correspond to those two black areas on the upper white bulges. They're exactly where OMS engines should be.

I agree that the whole thing looks wider than it should -- and this may well be an optical illusion, or perhaps an artifact of how video is shot. And the wingtips may also be gone, which would exaggerate the width.

The fact remains, however, that there are recognizable Shuttle parts, and they are exactly where they ought to be, and the view looks right from the angle at which it would have been shot.

Your "optical illusion" must have somehow included symmetric OMS engines, a body flap, a nose, and a very close approximation of the proper delta-wing shape, and the smooth curvature of the wing leading edge toward the nose.

That's one amazing optical illusion!! It's far easier to accept that this is a real image of a real Shuttle.

115 posted on 02/01/2003 11:23:20 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson