[finnman69]

Whether I show photos from the top or the bottom does not matter. I am showing photos from the rear. And from the same rear angle the proportions don't change. They don't change from a top view either. Even from the supposed underneath angle you think this image is, the 'fuselage' is way too wide compared to the wingspan.

you can also see that there is a lens flare in the video in the area people think they see debris. Funny thing is the flare moves exactly the same way the image moves. That's becasue its a flare, and is not a real object.

We are looking at a closeup of a bright object (the shuttle), and the lens is flaring up into a shape, that we think looks like a close up of the orbiter.

[mvpel]

Even from the supposed underneath angle you think this image is, the 'fuselage' is way too wide compared to the wingspan.

Maybe both wings had already been ripped off at that point?

[finnman69]

2 more pics that shows the image discussed below has a 'fuselage/rear flab/engine area' that is twice as wide as the actual shuttle. It aint a close up of the shuttle flying sideways.