Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MARK STEYN: Americans are tougher about these things now
The Sunday Telegraph ^ | February 2, 2003 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 02/01/2003 4:45:09 PM PST by MadIvan

The last early-morning Texan television viewers saw was a beautiful shot of the Shuttle Columbia streaking across a clear blue sky over Dallas, caught by the cameras at WFAA-TV. It sums up the marvels of the age - not only the extraordinary technology that enables man to return from a trip to space, but the ordinary everyday technology that lets a cameraman from a local television station capture the scene as it is happening overhead at 12,000 miles per hour. It's not just that most countries can't do the former, they can't manage the latter, either: everything about the moment sums up the remarkable pre-eminence of America.

Four decades ago, the space programme was the only romantic thing about an unromantic war - the competition between two high-tech superpowers to put a man on space, and then on the Moon. Now there is no one to compete with, and for America's new enemies in a new war "victory" means no more than American failure.

You can't take down a spaceship at 200,000 feet with a shoulder-launched missile. Even the Americans would have difficulty blowing the Shuttle out of the sky, though the missile defence system currently under development will be able to do it. Al-Qa'eda can't, and nor can the French or anyone else.

These days, American technology has to pace itself. But you don't have to believe, as NASA fretted in the weeks before launch, that this Shuttle could be a terrorist target to marvel at the almost perfect symbolism of Saturday's tragedy: the Columbia's crew included the first Israeli astronaut, Colonel Ilan Ramon; better yet, he was an Israeli who had participated in the successful raid on the Iraqi reactor at Osirak, back in the 1980s in those dark days before the policing of Saddam's nuclear programme was entrusted to Hans Blix; and, of course, the Shuttle came down over Texas, home state of the President and in the European press the favoured shorthand for what they see as the swaggering cowboy braggadocio of the US.

Indeed, you don't even have to be some Islamist death-cult loser in Ramallah to be dancing up and down in the street. Within an hour of the Shuttle's loss, a Canadian Broadcasting Corportation interviewer was gleefully asking her alleged expert whether the failure was due to American "arrogance", the same "arrogance" the Americans are currently demonstrating in the Middle East. The "expert" - a sci-fi writer - said no, it wasn't "arrogance". But an hour later the CBC was apparently citing mysterious "space experts" who thought "over-confidence" arising from Iraqi war fever had led Nasa to go ahead with the flight.

What happened yesterday is a personal tragedy and a symbolic disaster - in 42 years of manned flight, Nasa has never lost a crew during landing or the return in orbit. It is also a setback for Washington, which had plotted this week as a projection of American resolve: the State of the Union, Bush's meetings with Silvio Berlusconi and Tony Blair, all working up to Colin Powell's presentation to the United Nations Security Council. Now, instead of steely determination, the television screens will be filled with funerals, elegies, interviews with neighbours, mounds of flowers and teddy bears: it enables the networks to slip in to their preferred mode, of America as victim, weak and vulnerable, which is why ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN were so good on September 11 and, for the most part, so bad in the months since.

You can't blame the news shows for their priorities: for most Americans, this will be the only attention they have paid to the space programme since the last disaster - the disintegration of the Challenger on take-off in 1986. Nothing in between has captured the public imagination - pictures from Mars? Yawn. There's something very American about the presumption of success, about the way something unprecedented quickly becomes routine - unless it all goes wrong.

In 1986, President Reagan, eulogising the dead astronauts, said that they had "slipped the surly bonds of earth and touched the face of God". President Bush, whom commentators have increasingly compared to Reagan in recent months, is not so comfortable with grandiose poetic rhetoric; he is a more openly emotional man, and it will be the smaller human elements in the story that touch him - men and women in their early 40s, leaving behind young children. They were an American crew - four men, one black; two women, one born in India.

Nonetheless, this will not be as traumatisingly mesmeric as the Challenger disaster. The yellow-ribbon era died with September 11: even if their television networks haven't quite adjusted, Americans are tougher about these things; this is a country at war and one that understands how to absorb losses and setbacks.

What happened happened most likely because the Columbia was just so damn old and rusty. If anything, it symbolises not American "arrogance", but what happens when the great youthful innovative spirit of the country is allowed to atrophy: the entire space programme is now dependent on a transit system a generation old. If Mr Bush really wanted to emphasise the gulf between his country and both the Islamist cave dwellers and "Old Europe", he would announce a major renewal of the space project. A frontier is part of the US character.

Two weeks ago, when the Shuttle was launched, the enterprising internet commentator Charles Johnson posted an almost note-perfect parody of an Arab news report denouncing the presence of Colonel Ramon: "'This is surely but the first step towards complete and outright illegal Zionist occupation of space,' said the Arab League spokesman Abr Souffla. Sheikh Yermani-Makr, appearing on Palestinian television, said, 'It is not enough that the unbelievers have come on our land, but now they also take our heavens?' In New York today, the UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said that an Israeli presense in space is 'unhelpful' and would only serve to further aggravate tensions between Israelis and Arabs."

A couple of days later, the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz reprinted the internet story, apparently taking it for real. In an odd way, the world's reactions are beyond parody now. No doubt in the big-time mosques the A-list imams really will regard what happened as the judgment of Allah on the American-Zionist plan to seize the heavens. The rest of us will mourn the dead and urge Nasa to get on with the next flight. That's the American way.


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: america; columbia; disaster; marksteynlist; steyn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: MadIvan
Reaching Higher Ground

Descending, only to rise!
Leaving pull
Of God's green Earth
In a blaze of fire!

Worldly friction didn't win
Every trouble fades
On that heavenly high

Pushing out further
Than man has ever been
On the frontier
Of the deep dark night

Pushing the limits
Of this mortal life
We will never know
Unless we strive

The brave live forever
Seared into our hearts
Not knowing they were heroes
Just doing their part

But they'll not be forgotten
In the troubled times ahead
By courageous example
They have forever led

Elijah's chariot
Came to carry them away
To their eternal home
In God's eternal sky

EV

Dedicated to the crew of Columbia - 2/1/03


21 posted on 02/01/2003 5:22:35 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
President Bush, whom commentators have increasingly compared to Reagan in recent months, is not so comfortable with grandiose poetic rhetoric; he is a more openly emotional man, and it will be the smaller human elements in the story that touch him - men and women in their early 40s, leaving behind young children. They were an American crew - four men, one black; two women, one born in India.

R.I.P.

22 posted on 02/01/2003 5:26:40 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Within an hour of the Shuttle's loss, a Canadian Broadcasting Corporation interviewer was gleefully asking her alleged expert whether the failure was due to American "arrogance", the same "arrogance" the Americans are currently demonstrating in the Middle East.

A pox upon Canada and the CBC.

23 posted on 02/01/2003 5:28:15 PM PST by Eala (Columbia crew, requiescat in pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Yes he does. And so do our stalwart British allies.
24 posted on 02/01/2003 5:31:36 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laconic
There still is a communication blackout upon re-entry and actually other parts of orbit. Mainly, when the shuttle approaches extreme temperatures (in excess of 3,000 degrees Fh) there is a blackout and also a small blackout on the initial launch. I'm sure if you talked to a NASA official, he could give many more periods when there are blackouts.
25 posted on 02/01/2003 5:42:30 PM PST by rs79bm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Thanks, Pokey.
26 posted on 02/01/2003 5:49:10 PM PST by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm
Correct...still some periods of blackouts, which is why
NASA didn't freak immediately upon losing contact.
27 posted on 02/01/2003 5:52:09 PM PST by chiller (could be wrong, but doubt it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Eala
Within an hour of the Shuttle's loss, a Canadian Broadcasting Corporation interviewer was gleefully asking her alleged expert whether the failure was due to American "arrogance", the same "arrogance" the Americans are currently demonstrating in the Middle East.

Doubtless this same sentiment was heard on media outlets all over Europe. And then these people actually wonder why we Americans hold them in such contempt.

28 posted on 02/01/2003 5:54:08 PM PST by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Eala
This Canadian reporterette sounds a bit envious of US supremacy? Jealous, perhaps? Stupid bitch.
29 posted on 02/01/2003 5:55:06 PM PST by chiller (could be wrong, but doubt it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
* It is also a setback for Washington, which had plotted this week as a projection of American resolve:*

There's truth in this. Been thinking about this very thing in the back of my mind today. "What will it do to the process? What will it mean to the military, the Allies, etc. etc.?"

Bush declared a week of flags being lowered. This is bound to knock the wind out of the sails for a bit I think
30 posted on 02/01/2003 5:55:48 PM PST by prairiebreeze ("We won't deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents" --GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eala
Within an hour of the Shuttle's loss, a Canadian Broadcasting Corportation interviewer was gleefully asking her alleged expert whether the failure was due to American "arrogance", the same "arrogance" the Americans are currently demonstrating in the Middle East. The "expert" - a sci-fi writer - said no, it wasn't "arrogance". But an hour later the CBC was apparently citing mysterious "space experts" who thought "over-confidence" arising from Iraqi war fever had led Nasa to go ahead with the flight.

I think Ann Coulter would say we should not use ALL of our extra bombs on France.

31 posted on 02/01/2003 5:57:04 PM PST by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Don't agree. Onward and upward, gang...just as Mr. Steyn so properly explained.

Space travel isn't covered by Triple AAA auto.

32 posted on 02/01/2003 5:59:25 PM PST by chiller (could be wrong, but doubt it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I watched the Columbia land April 1981. We were building a house for the retired head of Sandia Labs and he called us in for "a historic moment".

These risked all for the benefit of all.

They showed the best of the American spirit: to have the sophistication and daring to seek knowledge on the dangerous path.

Steyn notes the predictable schadenfreude of America haters.

God receive those who today gave all for the benefit of all mankind.

Godspeed those who now go to safeguard our God-given freedoms.

. . .tougher about these things now. . .

33 posted on 02/01/2003 6:00:36 PM PST by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
Now there's a good thought. What's this Canadian bimbo's name,btw? I want to know. I want everyone to know.
34 posted on 02/01/2003 6:03:03 PM PST by chiller (could be wrong, but doubt it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Bush declared a week of flags being lowered. This is bound to knock the wind out of the sails for a bit I think

I'm going to get the extra-large barf bags ready. We're going to need them this next week while we watch the Rats shamelessly spin this for political gain.

35 posted on 02/01/2003 6:06:02 PM PST by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Mark Steyn makes the point technology can fail us at times. But he also reminds us the greatness of America as a country is its willingness to go where no one else dares. In our exploration of the heavens we will after we mourn our dearly departed dead to continue bringing back what they wanted to share with us - the excitement of new discoveries on the final frontier. As Ronald Reagan so justly said once America's best days are still to come and that is even more true now than ever.
36 posted on 02/01/2003 6:08:36 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
On the contrary, America is in no mood for any more stalling and bullship from the UN.
37 posted on 02/01/2003 6:13:08 PM PST by OldFriend (SUPPORT PRESIDENT BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
After Hitler had lost hope in his army, he turned for comfort to sendings from his familiar demons, and the signs, portents and auguries of astrology. He saw in Roosevelt's death the impending breakup of the alliance. These delusions, combined with drugs, kept him going until the last hours in the bunker.

I for one, am glad that the Islamists must, like Richard Reid, hope in the a last judgement by Allah to save them. They know in their hearts that their suicide warriors, their Osama Bin Ladens and their mighty armies have been snapped like a rotten twig. Yet they blaspheme to think that any just God, called Allah or not, will intervene to continue their program of murder. Perhaps they are right in this: God is rendering the Last Judgement and they are in the dock.
38 posted on 02/01/2003 6:15:21 PM PST by wretchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laconic
One of the network commentators alluded to TDRSS, the "Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System", as the key to maintaining communication through the descent through the upper atmosphere. See http://nmsp.gsfc.nasa.gov/tdrss/
39 posted on 02/01/2003 6:24:44 PM PST by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #40 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson