Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chesterbelloc
And thinking about it, that would be quite a zoom lens to get that much of a close up from at least 40 miles away.

Agreed. Then again, it was taken with a professional-quality camera, and they're very good.

At any rate, in addition to actually being the Shuttle, the image looks like the Shuttle: it has all the right things in the right places, and even roughly the right colors. I tend to think that, because of a good lens, or a trick of the optical path, it is a true image of the vehicle.

155 posted on 02/01/2003 10:48:53 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
You know when I saw this on tv early today I thought it was a shot directly behind the shuttle and then camera pulled back and it was obvious from the plume that it was a side shot. It doesn't seem likely that the shuttle could be moving sideways at that speed without immediately falling apart. I mean how much stress could the side of the shuttle take?

I wonder if NASA will be able to get accurate times for when all these videos were taken and match it up with their downloaded data of what was going on?
161 posted on 02/01/2003 11:06:08 PM PST by Chesterbelloc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson