To: socal_parrot
They said during the NASA press conference that most likely what was seen over California is plasma, not shuttle parts.
To: socal_parrot
"... compared notes with two news photographers who had arranged to photograph the re-entry through a telescope."
What?
Where are the photos!
Will a telescope be able to track something moving that fast?
To: socal_parrot
We are going to be finding debris for years. How many seconds is it from CA to TX for the shuttle and how many states can see it all at once.?
5 posted on
02/01/2003 2:29:21 PM PST by
Lady Jag
(Googolplex Start Thinker of the Seventh Galaxy of Light and Ingenuity)
To: socal_parrot
I hope the film they got helps solve the cause of this tradegy.
6 posted on
02/01/2003 2:29:29 PM PST by
vger
To: socal_parrot
Bump
9 posted on
02/01/2003 2:31:20 PM PST by
Fiddlstix
(Tag Line Service Center: Get your Tag Lines Here! Wholesale! (Cheaper by the Dozen!) Inquire Within)
To: socal_parrot
The trouble was reported here at FreeRepublic at 9:03 from a freeper from las Vegas.
here
It wasnt a glow that spread back like a comet but it must have been "on fire" because it was bright and big.
2/1/2003 9:03
10 posted on
02/01/2003 2:31:31 PM PST by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angles trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: socal_parrot
This report and the Vegas report later in this thread make sense.
Temperature sensors started failing several (five, six, seven) minutes before loss of contact over Texas. At 12,000 miles an hour in five minutes we are talking 1,000 miles.
16 posted on
02/01/2003 2:40:41 PM PST by
cgbg
To: socal_parrot
Bttt......And they will determine, without a doubt where the spacecraft started breaking up. I personally believe this guys account, given his background, etc.
To: socal_parrot
He said he had never witnessed a shuttle re-entry before and is not an authority on shuttles, but he immediately thought Columbia was having problems. End of discussion.
A downside of the instant information available, is that all sorts of silliness gets broadcast, like this.
49 posted on
02/01/2003 3:36:52 PM PST by
don-o
To: socal_parrot
I am reminded of the news stories surrounding the first shuttle flights. In those stories, a lot of attention was paid to the tiles, and in particular, to the potential for damaging the tiles on takeoff leading (if I recall correctly) eventually to a failure on re-entry. It seems to me that NASA and the entire crew could have been more aware of the potential and actual dangers than we might think or be led to believe by news reports at this point in time...
72 posted on
02/01/2003 4:46:18 PM PST by
SteveH
To: winodog
Your observations are confirmed here.
To: socal_parrot
I'm wondering if what was being seen early on, say over California, before the big breakup, was a bunch of the tiles coming off. I'm pretty sure I've read that when we watch these dramatic meteor showers like the Leonids, many of these objects are the size of grains of sand. If this is correct, something the size of these tiles could put on quite a display as it burns up there. If a bunch of them starting coming off from near the front and hitting other more aft areas of the aircraft, you'd be talking about 12,000 MPH projectiles that could've done serious damage. This is all pure conjecture on my part.
MM
To: Ben Ficklin
did you see this?
To: socal_parrot
256 posted on
02/02/2003 7:04:08 AM PST by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: socal_parrot
Early saturday Fox was showing an ameture video that they are no longer showing? (Confiscated by NASA) In that video STS107 is a normal single glowing contact with no contrail. @2 seconds later there is a bright flash and a small single piece is seen falling away with a slight contrail to it. Within seconds STS107 begins to develope a large contrail that is not normal as the second target piece also developes a larger contrail. Within another 5 seconds avery large contrail developes with what apperas to be tiles blowing off as there is a cloud of small targets coming off. Within a few more seconds a huge firball starts and the contrail is huge and as the contrail rotates an explosion (main engine tanks) creates a greator puff into the contrail which now appears to goe more sideways and than all hell breaks loose and now STS107 begins to massively break up into large parts and than multiple break ups into many parts.
Fox showed this video for a few times until around 1:00 PM pacific time and than cut off the first @7 seconds of this video when shwoing it again. Why? Anyone else recall this amature video?
To: socal_parrot
BUMP
302 posted on
02/07/2003 6:17:57 PM PST by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: socal_parrot
303 posted on
02/19/2003 11:42:55 AM PST by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: socal_parrot; aristeides; Fred Mertz
Tribute to the Risk Takers
304 posted on
05/30/2003 5:56:30 AM PDT by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson