To: LS
Of course, but it got cancelled because of the inordinate amount of funding it required. I would like to see new concepts designed that can do things more effectively and efficiently. We can do that, but it does require a lot of work.
2 posted on
02/01/2003 9:35:26 AM PST by
rs79bm
To: rs79bm
It did not require an "inordinate" amount of funding, especially for the technological problems it tackled. But my point was that every DELAY and government STRETCH-OUT actually INCREASED the cost. I remember, after one stretched out budget came back, that the managers sat around a table cancelling a dozen tests, or pushing them back. Each time, they would note how much cancelling or pushing it back COST THE TAXPAYER and would shake their heads.
27 posted on
02/01/2003 10:37:32 AM PST by
LS
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson