Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Notice the missing tiles on underside of wing....that's considered to be normal I expect...

G
11 posted on 02/01/2003 8:45:39 AM PST by GRRRRR (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: GRRRRR
From the other thred:

Story here:

Crack issue not settled, but shuttle chief optimistic Columbia will launch on time

By Chris Kridler
FLORIDA TODAY

CAPE CANAVERAL -- Shuttle managers aren't yet satisfied with tests on parts like one that was cracked in Discovery, but the shuttle program chief is optimistic Columbia will launch Jan. 16 as scheduled. "The shuttle is OK to fly in every other respect," said Jessica Rye, a spokeswoman for shuttle contractor United Space Alliance. "But a decision on whether the parts are safe won't come until a review Tuesday."

Shuttle mission managers held a formal launch readiness review on Thursday at Kennedy Space Center, but they decided more testing was needed before Columbia is cleared for launch, shuttle program manager Ron Dittemore said.

"We don't have any real indications that look like this is going to be a show-stopper for us," he said.

Shuttle managers will review data from tests Sunday afternoon to make sure they are ready to proceed with the countdown, which gets under way overnight Sunday. The crew goes into quarantine today and will fly into Kennedy Space Center on Sunday.

The cracked part was a ball in a support inside a liquid oxygen line in Discovery, found during the orbiter's continuing overhaul. Inspectors found no cracks in Columbia, Atlantis or Endeavour.

There are three sizes of balls in liquid oxygen and hydrogen line supports, called ball strut tie rod assemblies. They range from 2 1/4 inches to 1 1/4 inches, and there are 18 in each shuttle.

Since Columbia is on the launch pad, shuttle managers hope to avoid inspecting it, which could cause a launch delay. Instead, they want to be sure that even if any of the balls are cracked, they won't pose a danger to the orbiter.

Laboratory tests were used to induce surface cracks in spare parts, and engineers experienced with similar problems -- namely, the cracked fuel-pipe liners that grounded the fleet last summer -- found their expertise useful in analyzing the balls, Dittemore said.

"The most likely scenario is that we have a ball in a vehicle that has a small surface defect, and that, under load, over time, has propagated into a small crack," he said.

New inspection techniques found small defects in spare balls that were missed two decades ago when the shuttles were put into operation, he said.

There are no immediate plans to remove the cracked ball from Discovery, he said, but NASA will have to evaluate whether some balls should be replaced if the shuttles are expected to fly for 20 more years. < /end of story >

.

This story says cracks weren't found in Columbia, but Columbia wasn't even inspected.

20 posted on 02/01/2003 8:48:41 AM PST by ksen (HHD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: GRRRRR
Shuttles shed tiles like snakes shed scales. Loss and replacement is normal, and the craft can stand the loss of a few tiles. How many shuttles we have left?
26 posted on 02/01/2003 8:50:22 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: GRRRRR
Yeah. They lose tiles all the time. They're made to be ablative, so they can stick new ones on once they're down.

J
119 posted on 02/01/2003 9:06:18 AM PST by jedwardtremlett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: GRRRRR
I'm stunned; cannot stop crying. My heart is broken for all the families and the children. But ... if I see one Arab jumping up and down for joy at this loss of Ilan Ramon ... I cannot even express how angry I will be.

I heard Shepard Smith say there was some insulation which came loose during lift-off and it struck one of the wings. At the time, they determined it was not a threat ... now, I wonder if there was more damage than they realized ...?

I also heard that the people on the space station were expecting to come home in May or June - and now that may be delayed, or they will try to use the Russian capsule to rescue the space station people.
204 posted on 02/01/2003 9:18:39 AM PST by CyberAnt ( Syracuse where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: GRRRRR
Notice the missing tiles on underside of wing....that's considered to be normal I expect...

Yes, a certain amount of damage is normal. Columbia actually sustained quite a bit of tile damage on her first mission. 16 were knocked off and another 148 were damaged. (The shockwave from the SRBs igniting caused the damage. This lead to the waterfall sound suppression system that's turned on just before launch.) It would take quite a bit of damage to the tiles to cause a catastrophic failure.

259 posted on 02/01/2003 9:27:42 AM PST by Redcloak (Join the Coalition to Prevent Unnecessarily Verbose and Nonsensical Tag Lines, eh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson