Skip to comments.
Columbia Discussion thread
Feb 1, 2003
Posted on 02/01/2003 8:41:00 AM PST by Admin Moderator
Edited on 02/01/2003 9:11:45 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
'On behalf of posters on Free Republic, I post this with deepest sympathy for the crew and their families.
Mission - sts107
This is a continuation of the original thread.
Shuttle Contact LOST-No Tracking Data During RE-Entry!
ANY DU LINKS OR POSTS WILL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. Keep them on the original thread.
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: columbia; columbiatragedy; feb12003; india; israel; nasa; shuttle; spaceshuttle; sts107; unitedstates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 1,201-1,213 next last
To: rintense
If there was a loss of thermal protection over the gear doors, you could have a compromise of the tire pressure because of the relationship between temperature and pressure.
If the PLT or CDR noted a tire pressure gauge reading changing, it may be an indication of loss of integrity of the heat shield.
361
posted on
02/01/2003 9:44:41 AM PST
by
bonesmccoy
(Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
To: HighWheeler
Sounds silly, but maybe they'll make new shuttles like the ones in the movie 'Armageddon'.
362
posted on
02/01/2003 9:45:12 AM PST
by
rintense
(Go Get 'Em Dubya!)
To: Dog
.....but Brian Williams is working on my nerves... I turned off NBC because of Williams...he is arrogant and pompous and I cannot deal with him. So we agree. I want straight news on this - and you don't get that from him.
363
posted on
02/01/2003 9:45:30 AM PST
by
Wait4Truth
(I HATE THE MEDIA!!!)
To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping, Howlin.
Praying for the families of the astronauts and also for the families of the Challenger astronauts. This has got to be bringing all those devastating memories back.
It's eerie that this occurred so close to the anniversary dates of the other two NASA tragedies, the Apollo fire on 1/27/67, and Challenger on 1/28/86.
364
posted on
02/01/2003 9:45:33 AM PST
by
Otta B Sleepin
(Please sign the Adult Alert Petition @ http://www.petitiononline.com/adalert/)
To: rintense
My personal opinion, based on absolutely ZERO knowledge of anything remotely related to this, is that the 'Tire Pressure' loss was probably due to heat extreme enough to melt the tires... it would have to be pretty darned hot, however... but then, I could just be talking out my a$$, and have no qualms about saying so...
:0(
365
posted on
02/01/2003 9:45:53 AM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's really quite frightening.)
To: Mamzelle
Sorry we need to continue with human flights. Yes we have some success with robots, but they are very limited.
366
posted on
02/01/2003 9:46:21 AM PST
by
KevinDavis
(Marsward Ho!)
To: Mamzelle
"After the Challenger disaster, there was a long hiatus. That doesn't mean the same thing will happen. I doubt that this disaster will be the trauma that the Challenger was."You may be right but don't bet the farm on it.
"Non-renewable"? I assume you mean expendable launch vehicles, or conversely, non-rusable launch vehicles. I think there is a proper mix of manned and unmanned missions. I do not dispute the value of robotic exploration of the solar system. In fact, much will have to be done in this area before we send humans to anyplace in the solar system.
367
posted on
02/01/2003 9:46:30 AM PST
by
Movemout
(RIP you who dare and lose)
To: hole_n_one
Brian Williams: It falls again to the President to calm the nation, but thankfully we aren't talking about terrorism. NBC Reporter: A huge disaster in the making and the president will want to address that. The Department of Homeland Security has sent officials to the states where debris is known to have fallen due to the dangerous nature of the debris. The president will reflect the grief that has overcome the country.
368
posted on
02/01/2003 9:46:32 AM PST
by
Peach
To: bonesmccoy
Interesting stuff here. So if the heart shield is compromised, then obviously it can not be corrected by computers or crew.
369
posted on
02/01/2003 9:46:38 AM PST
by
rintense
(Go Get 'Em Dubya!)
To: rintense
Depends....if the tiles came off over a senstive area of the underbelly.....it could cause and explosion ....remember it is generating thousands of degrees of heat during reentry..
370
posted on
02/01/2003 9:46:41 AM PST
by
Dog
To: rintense
Ok, so if the landing gear is still retracted, then what could cause a change in tire pressure? Heat not anticipated by the designers, something breaking through the gear door and piercing the tire. The first would have caused a brief overinflation, followed by a tire explosion, while the latter would have caused an explosive decompression. The wheel well is, in all likelyhood, not pressurized.
To: SamAdams76
I watched the mission control coverage up until 9:15AM, not knowing that anything was wrong. Those people at mission control are as cool as cucumbers. I turned on the NASA-TV stream off a FR thread which noted that the shuttle would be passing over San Fran on its glide path home. Tuned in at 9:00 EST, and withing a couple of minutes, the capccom was giving the "Columbia, Houston" call. Silence.
Call was repeated, Silence.
The commentatore was noting that no tracking data was coming in either. My pulse began to race. I knew it was a goner.
This is truly a sad day.
But, America shall roll sleeves up, figure out what went wrong, and get on with it. I am hoping for a fast track program for the next generation of space travel. Back to the Moon, then on to Mars.
I expect that the folks on Columbia would want it that way.
372
posted on
02/01/2003 9:46:50 AM PST
by
don-o
Comment #373 Removed by Moderator
To: bootless
Not impossible from the inside... an altitude or barometric-sensitive bomb. The shuttle was overhauled within the last year. First Israeli astronaut - who led a mission in the Israeli Air Force against the Iraqi nuclear infrastructure. Sleeper within the support crew? Were that the case you would expect someone to cal in and claim 'credit' for the work.
374
posted on
02/01/2003 9:47:33 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
(The question is not whether you're paranoid, but whether you're paranoid enough.)
To: rintense; ambrose; Howlin; bootless
I think they will discuss every possibility. That's why I think right now, the FBI has begun a background check on every single person that was involved with the Columbia upgrade this past year.The speculation of external terrorism is of course not the issue. That IMO is wht they are discounting.
rintense, let's hope political correctness doesn't rear it's ugly head and they investigate every possibility.
It is premature to hear the reports that say there is no indication of terrorism. From what little that is known now, there is also no indication it is not terrorism, ie they know almost nothing at this time.
It always bothers me when they prematurely rule things in or out even before they have any information one way or another.
The process they were going through at the time was very delicate manauvering considering how exact the process of re-entry is and is probably the most dangerous part of the return, and they routinely loose radio contact during this particual time. The concern began when contact did not return.
This going to be a long process IMO. Speculation is pretty all over the place at this time.
375
posted on
02/01/2003 9:47:39 AM PST
by
Dr. Zoo
(Not to speculate, but I think it was not terrorism.)
To: Privatize NASA
Not today, please. We have deaths here.
376
posted on
02/01/2003 9:47:49 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: rintense
Many astronauts have large goofs on their resume, including the ones generally held in the most reverence. Her goof gave other astronauts the opportunity for some EVA, and you can be sure they were lots happier about that than annoyed!! Making small goofs sometimes teaches how to avoid fatal goofs. In sum, the goof was no indicator of anything. And...she was not a pilot...
To: Chad Fairbanks
well, at least judy on cnn has confirmed the shuttle did not hit a commercial jetliner as it crossed texas. no i am not kidding.
378
posted on
02/01/2003 9:47:54 AM PST
by
glock rocks
(God bless America)
To: steveegg
Highly doubtful. The only anti-air missile that may have been able to reach up to 200,000 feet is Russia's anti-ballistic missile, which is deployed in fixed sites around Moscow. Morever, that missile is nuclear-tipped. I think we would have noticed that.
To: AshleyMontagu
And what's with the bonehead Indian gal onboard? This flight was a multi-culti sideshow. If we're serious about space exploration let's act serious and use real pros for all flights. (Wonder how many foregn programmers NASA has on payroll).
Like I said elsewhere, sometimes events like this bring out the worst in the worst.
-Eric
380
posted on
02/01/2003 9:48:12 AM PST
by
E Rocc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 1,201-1,213 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson