Please note that I can't link you directly to the article because the NY Post has only pay archives. If you want it badly enough to pay, the link will get you to the archive listing for this story.
Shot him twice "by accident?" Yeah, I'm sure it's a tradition in Brooklyn to hold a loaded gun with the safety off while arguing with your boyfriend.
In a way, he got what he wanted: He won't have to take care of the kid.
To: 2nd amendment mama; A2J; aposiopetic; attagirl; axel f; Balto_Boy; bulldogs; Charlie OK; ...
ProLife Ping! If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
2 posted on
02/01/2003 7:05:18 AM PST by
Mr. Silverback
(Going to war without French support is like going hunting without an accordion.)
To: Mr. Silverback
Maybe he wanted to get married and she didn't want to lose her welfare check.
3 posted on
02/01/2003 7:19:31 AM PST by
shiva
To: Mr. Silverback; MHGinTN
I anticipate that the pro-abortion movement will portray this as "another murder by the anti-choice thugs." Notice that the woman on trial DID NOT want an abortion. Therefore, unless and until she holds a press conference announcing (loudly and at great length) her support of a woman's "right to choose" death for her unborn child, she will be described as an "anti-choice murderer," and linked with Clayton Waagner and James C. Kopp.
4 posted on
02/01/2003 7:19:31 AM PST by
Bryan
To: Mr. Silverback
He apparently supported a woman's right to chose.
She chose to abort him, and keep the baby.
5 posted on
02/01/2003 7:23:34 AM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
To: Mr. Silverback
The "right to choose" is a grim euphemism indeed, since numerous young girls are not given a real opportunity to choose. It's very common--maybe even in the majority of cases--for the boyfriends to bribe, pressure or force them to have an abortion. It's also not unknown for parents to drag their daughters to an abortion clinic. Contrariwise, if the parents are pro-life, it's not uncommon for some school councilor or planned-parenthood official to lean heavily on the girl to have an abortion without informing her parents and without any real opportunity to consider the alternatives.
This woman is going to have an uphill battle convincing a New York court to let her off. When abortion is involved, the usual priorities of a liberal judge are to do whatever is necessary to preserve the "right" to unlimited abortions under any circumstances. When a potentially embarrassing issue arises, such as a violent boyfriend, this kind of dirt has to be shoveled under the rug as quickly as possible.
9 posted on
02/01/2003 9:55:27 AM PST by
Cicero
To: Mr. Silverback
She saved that baby's life. She should be given a medal.
10 posted on
02/01/2003 10:11:43 AM PST by
LoveMyCountry
(Love my country, or get the hell out)
To: Mr. Silverback
A Brooklyn woman, who admitted she shot her boyfriend dead during a fight in their car over whether she should have an abortionWhy were they in their car? Was he trying to take her to an abortion clinic and she was defending the life of her child?
11 posted on
02/01/2003 10:21:48 AM PST by
FITZ
To: Mr. Silverback
But prosecutors and Sampson's family say White fired in a rage after he went with his sister to serve White an order of protection to end their six-year relationship.It should be pretty easy to tell if he had an order of protection with him when the killing happened.
Why does the newspaper give so much more space to the woman's story than the man's?
14 posted on
02/01/2003 10:47:01 AM PST by
xm177e2
(smile) :-)
To: Mr. Silverback
Revolvers don't have safeties...no one in Brooklyn is dumb enough to get in a gunfight in a car with a semi-auto. Geesh!
16 posted on
02/01/2003 10:57:43 AM PST by
D Rider
To: Mr. Silverback
Revolvers don't have safeties...no one in Brooklyn is dumb enough to get in a gunfight in a car with a semi-auto. Geesh!
17 posted on
02/01/2003 1:17:15 PM PST by
D Rider
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson