Skip to comments.
Mexican Chiapas rebels threaten U.S. ranch owners
Reuters Alert News ^
| 01 Feb 2003 00:09
| Elizabeth Fullerton
Posted on 01/31/2003 5:52:18 PM PST by neutrino
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: neutrino
Wersch and Jones, former Peace Corps volunteers who invested their life savings in the ranch
Apparently they didn't save enough to buy some newspapers for the last decade or so, to get a glimmer that their little dream wasn't really viable.
21
posted on
01/31/2003 6:53:12 PM PST
by
ErnBatavia
((Bumperootus!))
To: Teacher317
Sow the fields with salt and go I see that you have an appreciation for the classical approach, as do I!
22
posted on
01/31/2003 6:55:57 PM PST
by
neutrino
(Audaces fortuna juvat)
To: neutrino
Set fire to the house and barn, then spray the entire ranch with Agent Orange, and put sulfer in the water, grab a gun and put up a sign that says, "tresspassers will be shot", and buy a couple of hungry tigers to prowl the land for fresh meat.
23
posted on
01/31/2003 7:28:38 PM PST
by
PokeyJoe
(Practically new French Rifles for sale...never fired, only dropped once. 555-1212, ask for Fritz)
To: neutrino
Since 1994, pro-Zapatista peasants have invaded hundreds of rich ranches around Ocosingo, the nearest town to Rancho Esmeralda and some 300 miles (500 km) south of Mexico City.
The government has let the peasants keep the bulk of the property in a belated attempt at land redistribution.
From Zimbabwe to Mexico in only a few years .... my my how progress goes.
24
posted on
01/31/2003 7:39:55 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(The question is not whether you're paranoid, but whether you're paranoid enough.)
To: PokeyJoe
Leg popper land mines are less air polution. Remember the New World Order!
25
posted on
01/31/2003 7:44:03 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
To: B4Ranch
Leg popper land mines are less air polution And can be made from 12 gauge shells and pipe quite easily. :)
If you lose your land, deny anyone decent use of it.
26
posted on
01/31/2003 8:09:07 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(The question is not whether you're paranoid, but whether you're paranoid enough.)
To: FITZ; Spiff; Fish out of Water; Ajnin; Tancred; backhoe; DoughtyOne; Marine Inspector; ...
fyi
27
posted on
02/01/2003 6:54:27 AM PST
by
madfly
To: madfly
Gosh, I wonder what Bush's buddy Vicente Fox has to say about this...
To: janetgreen
I think Bush's buddy Fox wasted his administration. Instead of making conditions better in Mexico, he was eagerly trying to get rid of as many of his citizens as he could and instead that made things worse.
I think history will show that the safety valved named the USA backfired on the Mexican elites.
29
posted on
02/01/2003 10:01:27 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: BJungNan
The U.S. should immediately take over that country, clean it up and make it the mecca it should and could be. It might be too late. We've managed to prop up the elite ruling class of Mexico for so long now. There is a great hunger for "government of the people, by the people, for the people" in Mexico but there have been Communists working overtime down there while we befriended their oppressors.
30
posted on
02/01/2003 10:06:19 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: FITZ
I think Bush's buddy Fox wasted his administration I concur. It's called taking the easy way out. All boots, no brains.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson