Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
I was torn between the two, 16th and 17th.

My decision to name the 16th is that honestly I don't really understand how the 17th hurts so much. I understand that making Senators answerable to majority is bad but to what extent I haven't quite put my finger on.

Mr. Paul is a Libertarian, runnning as a pubbie so that he can get elected.

I voted a pretty good mix this last season. Example..I voted for Smith-R for US Senate but for Cox-L as governor.

28 posted on 01/31/2003 3:43:44 PM PST by EBUCK (....reloading....praparing to FIRE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: EBUCK
Other than the 14th (which I'm growing to hate), the 17th further blurs the separation between the states and the feds.

Why do we need the people to vote on a representative and a senator? Who's looking after the interest of the individual state?

The 14th and 17th have combined to make the states homogenous. That's one step closer to a democracy, rather than a representative republic.

34 posted on 01/31/2003 4:18:57 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: EBUCK
homogenous = homogeneous
43 posted on 02/01/2003 5:27:34 AM PST by robertpaulsen (FR needs a spell checker - actually RP needs one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson