Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cesspools of socialism
World Net Daily ^ | January 30, 2003 | Henry Lamb

Posted on 01/31/2003 4:23:12 AM PST by Carbonsteel

Across America, a lethal virus is infecting college campuses. It breeds in cesspools of socialist philosophy. One manifestation is called STARC (Students Transforming and Resisting Corporations).

STARC is an alliance of organizations, funded by the Youth Empowerment Center, which produced activist protesters from 200 campuses for their anti-war demonstrations in Washington.

Their goal is to transform society into the utopian vision of Agenda 21 – a "sustainable" society – in compliance with the U.N.'s Declaration of Human Rights, in which economic development, environmental protection and social equity are balanced in policies determined by consensus, facilitated through what they call "participatory democratic action."

Restructuring corporations is only slightly ahead of restructuring government on their priority list.

Corporations, the offspring of capitalism, are thought to be the essence of evil, which cause all the world's major problems. Proctor & Gamble, McDonalds, Wal-Mart, Dow Chemical, Smith-Barney, Chevron, Shell Oil and Occidental Petroleum are at the top of their "egregious 8" list. A dozen more corporations are also targeted for "direct action," as well. Corporations have to be brought under the control of "the people," according to STARC.

STARC believes that "goods and services should be distributed democratically;" and questions "whether the benefits of our present mode of existence outweigh their detrimental effects on our society, and on people and environments of all regions of the planet."

This attack on corporations is not new. There have been numerous initiatives at the international level to bring multi-country corporations under the regulatory authority of the United Nations. Several U.S. corporations have been attacked by radical extremists who don't want McDonald's to use white paper bags; or think Home Depot should sell only "green-label" lumber; or demand that Staples sell recycled paper.

The STARC goals are much grander than these single extortion campaigns. Their goal is to actually gain positions in the corporate decision-making process. One goal is to gain representation on corporate boards, not by purchasing sufficient stock, but through coercion, intimidation and "direct action," that will stop only when representation is granted. More extravagant proposals seek legislation that requires "community" representation on corporate boards as a condition of legitimacy.

STARC ambitions go beyond corporations, all the way to governance. America's system of representative government, funded by corporations, must also be transformed. STARC says:

We believe in grassroots, democratic decision-making and a constant dialogue between theory and practice, allowing every community to fashion solutions that meet their specific and particular needs.

The President's Council on Sustainable Development put it this way:

We need a new collaborative decision process that leads to better decisions; more rapid change; and more sensible use of human, natural and financial resources in achieving our goals.

Neither of these statements fully describe the "decision process" that is envisioned, but it is being implemented in communities across the country. Nearly every community saw some form of "visioning" council come into existence during the Clinton-Gore years. These councils consist of professionals employed by non-government organizations, and bureaucrats employed by agencies of government.

These councils conduct community meetings at which public input is said to be collected and shaped into consensus recommendations – that "fashion solutions that meet their specific and particular needs."

These meetings do no such thing. They provide the appearance of public approval for proposing a set of pre-determined policy recommendations, consistent with Agenda 21 and the President's Council on Sustainable Development.

Ultimately, the recommendations require government control of virtually every aspect of human life. Neighborhood councils, described by STARC as "grassroots democratic decision-making," is much like the hierarchy of soviets in the former Soviet Union. The difference being that instead of control being in the hands of the "Party," control is vested in the approved or "accredited" non-government organization. Neighborhood councils are to respond to community councils that are to respond to bioregional councils, that respond to the national council, which sends delegates to the "People's Assembly" that meets for two weeks prior to the opening of the U.N. General Assembly.

Where are elected officials in this scenario? City councils, county commissions, state legislatures and even Congress drift toward policy irrelevance, responsible only for imposing the taxes that fund the policies developed through facilitated participatory democratic action. This is the "new decision process" envisioned by the PCSD.

STARC is probably caught up in youthful zeal to save the world, with little understanding of the magnitude of the philosophical shift they espouse. The funders of these initiatives are the culprits, and they are safely out of sight, way behind the scenes. The future STARC is pursuing is a socialist future, whether or not they realize it. America, and the world, deserve freedom.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/31/2003 4:23:12 AM PST by Carbonsteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel

"Their goal is to transform society into the utopian vision of Agenda 21 – a "sustainable" society – in compliance with the U.N.'s Declaration of Human Rights, in which economic development, environmental protection and social equity are balanced in policies determined by consensus, facilitated through what they call "participatory democratic action."

Restructuring corporations is only slightly ahead of restructuring government on their priority list.

Corporations, the offspring of capitalism, are thought to be the essence of evil, which cause all the world's major problems. Proctor & Gamble, McDonalds, Wal-Mart, Dow Chemical, Smith-Barney, Chevron, Shell Oil and Occidental Petroleum are at the top of their "egregious 8" list. A dozen more corporations are also targeted for "direct action," as well. Corporations have to be brought under the control of "the people," according to STARC. "

 

Why is the word "democratic" associated with all factions that would do their best to undermine our constitution? Certainly they must realize they are espousing social and economic terrorism.


2 posted on 01/31/2003 4:37:19 AM PST by tomball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomball

"Why is the word "democratic" associated with all factions that would do their best to undermine our constitution?"

As far as I can see, democracy is one of the foundations of socialism, even though socialism always results in tyranny. I don't believe our Constitution guarantees pure democracy, but rather carefully avoids it.

"Their goal is to transform society into the utopian vision of Agenda 21 – a "sustainable" society – in compliance with the U.N.'s Declaration of Human Rights, in which economic development, environmental protection and social equity are balanced in policies determined by consensus"

Basically, what they are calling for here is nationalization of corporations - economic activity controlled by "consensus," or, in other words, by the state. It amounts to nothing less than creating state run corporations that have the power to write law. A scary thought. Not to mention the basically Stalinist, totalitarian thrust of the entire above paragraph, which calls for all of society to be under control of "consensus," which means the state. Interesting that they use the UN for authority.

3 posted on 01/31/2003 4:56:03 AM PST by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel
Note to college students, this was tried and failed. Suggest you study history of FORMER USSR.
4 posted on 01/31/2003 5:30:33 AM PST by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; madfly; Stand Watch Listen; brityank; OldFriend; Grampa Dave; editor-surveyor; ...
bump
5 posted on 02/02/2003 2:05:07 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe (God Armeth The Patriot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
BTTT!!!!!
6 posted on 02/02/2003 2:06:53 PM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel
STARC is probably caught up in youthful zeal to save the world, with little understanding of the magnitude of the philosophical shift they espouse.

Here's to all the years of these social do-gooders playing violent video games and thus being desensitized to real death at the hands of real enemies...

None of these little snotty nosed world savers have ever seen a mass grave before, I would suspect. Keep it up, Kids. That's where we all would end up if you believe The Big Red Lie ...Again.

I have no sympathy for cowards that work behind the scenes to do their dastardly deeds supporting such movements and encouraging anarchy in the guise of reform.

7 posted on 02/02/2003 2:33:00 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel
These people seem to have boundless energy and inexhaustible resources in their fight against America and the Constitution.

In my own little California town I'm reading in the newapaper about a couple of guys who are starting what they call a Socrates Cafe. The thing that drew my attention (recalling the 60s radicals) was the fact that it's based in a local coffee house. Apparently there are hundreds of these things all over the country. The idea is to appeal to people with intellectual pretentions, then discuss issues (with the aid of a 'facilitator') to reach what I think are predictably Leftist conclusions. I suspect the sponsors feel "graduates" of these sessions will have influence in the community, pushing for what I guess are liberal causes in communities across the country.

Are any FReepers reading this familiar with them? Am I wrong? The program appears to be centered at www.philosopher.org, which seems harmless enough until you notice the connection with the Utne Reader. I followed some of those links and came away thinking this is just another Left Wing front organization "thinking globally and acting locally."
8 posted on 02/02/2003 2:36:18 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel
http://www.truemajority.com

this web site will list many groups who support and fund the protestors.
9 posted on 02/02/2003 2:36:24 PM PST by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lockbox
Abolish STARC and abolish the UN!

Be Well - Be Armed - Be Safe - Molon Labe!
10 posted on 02/02/2003 3:30:34 PM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Thanks for the heads up!
11 posted on 02/02/2003 4:16:04 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel

Click Sign
12 posted on 02/02/2003 6:59:30 PM PST by Coleus (RU 486 Kills Babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel
'nother article...
13 posted on 02/02/2003 7:02:25 PM PST by dogbrain (...maybe "shield" isn't quite the correct word for them.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lockbox
Yep, tried and failed everywhere, and the usual rebuttal is that 1. it's not been tried here (har!) and 2. the entire world must participate in socialism before it can work.

BTW, if you look at the donations made to various left-wing orgs by the multi-nationals, it seems the socialists have already made significant inroads.

14 posted on 02/02/2003 8:47:55 PM PST by banjo joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
In my own little California town I'm reading in the newapaper about a couple of guys who are starting what they call a Socrates Cafe.

Any chance the customers will sit around and drink hemlock?

15 posted on 02/02/2003 9:38:40 PM PST by DuncanWaring (...and Freedom tastes of Reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel
Purges Bump!
16 posted on 02/02/2003 9:43:50 PM PST by wardaddy (If you can't beat em, eat em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
Any chance the customers will sit around and drink hemlock?

Eventually, but the socialist poison kills slowly. Great response, though.

17 posted on 02/02/2003 9:45:44 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel
And articles such as these are never complete without some information on the The Delphi Technique.
There are so many places and ways that the technique can be used...
The "Delphi Technique" And How It Robs Parents of Control Over Their Child's Education
18 posted on 02/03/2003 2:46:32 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel
Kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.


BUMP

19 posted on 02/03/2003 3:04:44 AM PST by tm22721 (Those without a sword can still die upon it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carbonsteel
I can only assume these mental midgets are living in tents (manufactured by themselves) and growing their own food and walking everywhere and manufacturing their own clothing? Of course not..how much of their mommy and daddy's money is going to fund these communist adventures?
20 posted on 02/03/2003 1:46:22 PM PST by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson