Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DFSchmidt
...but how can we treat scientific inquiry and the scripture in the same fashion?

One can treat different statements of truth consistently. In regards to South American, Egyptian and other civilizations, Scripture also records the Word of God in speaking of prehistoric issues, before Adam, and before the formation of the our domain. The precepts of Scripture were formed in eternity past. Far earlier than any scientific applicability.

360 posted on 02/24/2003 7:52:23 PM PST by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]


To: Cvengr
One can treat different statements of truth consistently.

I agree! But we're back to the assumption that the Scripture was meant to be taken as the literal truth :) If, hypothetically, it were not meant to be taken in this way, all of the time, we should be careful.

That aside, though, I come back to the crucial distinction I made between science and religion, with respect to the idea of faith. That we must make such a distinction shows that we are talking about two different realms, with different standards of judgement.

Your use of the word "truth" as an absolute further emphasizes this point - As we've discussed before, there aren't any absolute truths in science, only our current, best supported theories. This is in contrast to religion, where anyone of a particular faith will believe in the truth of their religion, as they perceive it. Note the differences in both language and the implications of the language. This is why we must make distinctions.

In regards to South American, Egyptian and other civilizations, Scripture also records the Word of God in speaking of prehistoric issues, before Adam, and before the formation of the our domain. The precepts of Scripture were formed in eternity past. Far earlier than any scientific applicability.

Absolutely! The events described in the Scriptures go back to the beginning of time, hence Creation. But that's not quite the same as what you were saying previously:

Scripture has been around longer than science.

The Scriptures themselves do not predate science, even if the events described therein do (granted, "may" may be a better word, depending on when God created science, but that isn't written ;) Hope that clears up what I meant - Granted, it's an important distinction.

Thanks for reading,

DFS

361 posted on 02/24/2003 10:46:15 PM PST by DFSchmidt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson