Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mylroie: Clintonized CIA Blocking Iraq-9/11 Evidence
NewsMax.com ^ | Thursday Jan. 30, 2003

Posted on 01/30/2003 9:32:30 AM PST by honway

The CIA is blocking critical intelligence that links Saddam Hussein to the 9/11 attacks, a former top terrorism advisor to President Clinton is contending, and by doing so, she says, the agency is weakening President Bush's case for war against Iraq.

Asked about Salman Pak, the terrorist training camp near Baghdad where, according to a number of Iraqi defectors, al Qaeda terrorists have practiced for years hijacking American airliners using the same methods employed on 9/11, Clinton Iraqi expert Laurie Mylroie told WABC Radio's Steve Malzberg:

"There's a huge debate within the (Bush) administration. The Defense Department wants to bring out information like that. The CIA, which is responsible for dealing with terrorism, accommodated Clinton's desire not to hear about Iraq and terrorism, does not want that information to come out. It acts as Saddam's lawyer."

Mylroie served as President Clinton's top advisor on Iraq during the 1992 campaign, and she has lectured on Middle Eastern terrorism and its origins at the Naval War College and Harvard University. Mylroie is also author of the book, "The War Against America," which details Baghdad's role in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

Just minutes before Bush's State of the Union address Tuesday night, Mylroie told Malzberg, "For any official statement to be made by the government, there is an interagency review process and the CIA blocks (the Salman Pak) information. Their response is to say, the defectors are not reliable - because they oppose Saddam you can't believe them."

What about satellite photos backing up accounts from Salman Pak defectors who describe a Boeing 707 parked on the ground, which they say serves as a classroom for Saddam's hijack trainees?

According to Mylroie, the CIA offers the bizarre alibi that the plane "could have been used by the Iraqis for counter-hijacking."

The Clinton terrorism expert says the White House is partly to blame for not forcing U.S. intelligence services to be more forthright about the information they have on Salman Pak, complaining, "Bush has failed to discipline the bureaucracy. And they have put their careers above Bush's career."

Asked to detail the precise role of Iraq in al Qaeda operations directed against the U.S., Mylroie told WABC, "Al Qaeda acts as a front for Iraqi intelligence. Al Qaeda provides the ideology, the foot soldiers and the cover. And Iraqi intelligence provides the direction, training and expertise."

Commenting on reports that the White House would use the State of the Union address to reinforce the argument that Saddam has been working with al Qaeda for years, Mylroie noted, "I'm glad (President Bush) is going to talk about Iraq and al Qaeda. (But) I have some concern that because powerful individuals and institutions are even now unwilling to acknowledge their error, the case is going to be a lot weaker than it could be."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; jihadinamerica; salmanpak; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 last
To: NJJ
bump
121 posted on 01/31/2003 8:35:19 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
bump
122 posted on 02/01/2003 12:28:52 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Re: Your #64....Agreed.
123 posted on 02/01/2003 7:17:36 AM PST by Matthew James (SPEARHEAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Matthew James
It's a shame that Rummy can't take care of the loyalty problem with a Saddam style RIF.
124 posted on 02/01/2003 12:00:27 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
bump to the top
125 posted on 02/02/2003 9:17:07 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: timestax
Rebump.
126 posted on 02/02/2003 12:49:31 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: muggs
bump
127 posted on 02/03/2003 8:13:29 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: honway
More damage by the Clinton administraion.
128 posted on 02/03/2003 8:28:48 AM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert; OKCSubmariner; Lion's Cub; thinden; The Great Satan; piasa
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030210fa_fact

THE UNKNOWN
by JEFFREY GOLDBERG
The C.I.A. and the Pentagon take another look at Al Qaeda and Iraq.

Recently, I asked two former C.I.A. directors, James Woolsey and Robert Gates, to talk about the problem of analyzing an incomplete set of evidence—the same challenge that stymied intelligence analysts in the days before December 7, 1941, and September 11, 2001.

Woolsey, who served as President Clinton's first C.I.A. director, said that it is now illogical to doubt the notion that Saddam collaborates with Islamist terrorism, and that he would provide chemical or biological weapons to Al Qaeda. "At Salman Pak"—a training camp near Baghdad—"we know there were Islamist terrorists training to hijack airplanes in groups of four or five with short knives," Woolsey told me. "I mean, hello? If we had seen after December 7, 1941, a fake American battleship in a lake in northern Italy, and a group of Asian pilots training there, would we have said, 'Well, you can't prove that they were Japanese'?"

129 posted on 02/04/2003 7:45:33 AM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter; timestax
A reply #129 bump FYI.
130 posted on 02/04/2003 7:51:52 AM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
bump to the top
131 posted on 02/04/2003 8:04:25 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: honway
Bump.
132 posted on 02/04/2003 11:55:08 AM PST by DoctorMichael (Liberals SuK; Liberalism SuX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muggs
bump
133 posted on 02/08/2003 2:31:34 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: JoeA
bump for newbies to read
134 posted on 02/11/2003 9:40:12 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: honway
bump
135 posted on 06/13/2003 5:52:41 PM PDT by pttttt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
bump
136 posted on 06/13/2003 5:53:14 PM PDT by pttttt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson