It is not "anti-First Amendment" for anyone to try to pressure show sponsors. If this were true, then nearly every successful such campaign by social conservative groups like the American Family folks in Mississippi or Dobson's "Focus on the Family" organization are also "anti-First Amendment."
I admit that I grow tired of the hypocrisy shown here on FR. What's good for the goose, and all that.
If we can "FReep," then the Libs can do whatever their version of same is.
You're right; do your own letter-writing campaign, but to be honest this is a tempest in a teapot. No intelligent sponsor of Rush's show is going away anytime soon, because they know they can reach the target audience they desire by advertising there.
Why don't we pay attention to matters that actually make a dime's worth of difference in this world?
N.B. I'm alerting the moderators to change the title of this to the ORIGINAL title, which is the policy on FR so that the number of duplicate posts can be reduced. Also, it's embarrassing to show the world how ignorant FReepers are on the Constitution.
I believe that the left created all means of civil defiance. Some Freepers mimic a few of these actions such as boycotting advertisers. No one should disagree that such action is fair for both sides under our system.
Also what are your feelings on the Left’s tactics such as riots, burning, and stealing. Are these also constitutionally protected actions?