To: M. Thatcher
Progressive? Call them what they are, socialists.
48 posted on
01/29/2003 10:19:07 PM PST by
Howlin
To: Howlin
CALL THEM COMMUNIST!
Henry Wallace, formerly FDR's vice president and agriculture secretary, left the Democratic Party that year to form the communist-dominated and Soviet-backed "Progressive Party." Much as Thurmond's Dixiecrat Party was expressly pro-segregation, Wallace's Progressive Party was expressly pro-Soviet.
Indeed, this was the apex of Moscow-directed subversion of U.S. politics. The Progressive Party platform excluded even the mildest criticism of Soviet aggression. It will come as no surprise that many American celebrities supported Wallace. The Progressives received 1 million votes nationwide, about the same as Thurmond's Dixiecrat Party.
Thurmond went on to reject segregation, become a Republican, and serve his country well as a U.S. senator. By contrast, running a communist-dominated presidential campaign was Wallace's last hurrah. Yet only an off-the-cuff remark at a birthday party praising Thurmond's presidential campaign is the career-destroyer. Not so fawning references to Wallace's Soviet-backed presidential campaign.
ANN COULTER
http://www.anncoulter.org/columns/2002/121802.htm
58 posted on
01/29/2003 10:27:13 PM PST by
TLBSHOW
(just a internet liberal; basher that is hated by the leftwing nuts!)
To: Howlin
Call them what they are, socialists.Yep. I was quoting. Actually, they are commie pinko fascists.
To: Howlin
"Progressive? Call them what they are, socialists."You have that right. The left have been trying to get Rush off the air since he made it big. They haven't done it so far and I doubt they will do it in the future.
To: Howlin
Progressive? Call them what they are, socialists. Liberal Socialist Progressives (LSP's)
176 posted on
01/30/2003 5:17:29 AM PST by
alrea
To: Howlin
Progressive? Call them what they are, socialists. Howlin, I get real tired of posting this...
Ms. Spain and her fellow-traveling, lick-spittle lackey comrades are not 'Socialists'. Neither are they 'leftists', or 'progressives' or 'liberals' or any other such newspeak bullshit.
They are hard-core, unrepentant 'neo-Stalinists' and nothing but.
Geeze, I could really use some help down here in the language war.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson