Skip to comments.
Iran Outraged by Bush Speech
BBC ^
| 1/29/03
Posted on 01/29/2003 3:57:52 PM PST by marshmallow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Mr Kharrazi replied that: "The Iranian nation does not need to get advice from outside." It's not advice. It's a warning. Keep your festering Islamic revolution to yourselves and don't attempt to assist in any way those who want to spill American blood.
Then we'll all get along just fine.
To: marshmallow
No, Pres. Bush wasn't handing out advice. He was telling Iran "you're next".
2
posted on
01/29/2003 3:59:19 PM PST
by
txradioguy
(Doing my part to keep the country free)
To: marshmallow
We should just say, don't worry Mr Kharrazi, we put you in line right behind PRNC.
3
posted on
01/29/2003 4:00:45 PM PST
by
exnavy
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: wartank11
Let them wail..just like DPRK, they need a pascifier in their mouth.
5
posted on
01/29/2003 4:03:00 PM PST
by
jeepster
(I think freedom rocks....)
To: wartank11
Agreed. I think there's enough people unhappy with the Mullah's in Iran that they will return to democracy on their own. The thought of Iran and Iraq BOTH being democratically ruled must be giving Prince bin Sultan some sleepless nights in Saudi Arabia.
6
posted on
01/29/2003 4:04:02 PM PST
by
txradioguy
(Doing my part to keep the country free)
To: txradioguy
He was telling Iran "you're next".Who is next after that?
To: wartank11
We are putting our support to the people of Iran for internal revolution.
If we offer encouragement are we morally obligated to help ?
8
posted on
01/29/2003 4:04:26 PM PST
by
uncbob
To: ThomasJefferson
Then we deal with DPRK. When we deal with them from a position of strentgh, it will make the ChiComs think twice about pulling anything funny in the Formosa Strait.
9
posted on
01/29/2003 4:05:39 PM PST
by
txradioguy
(Doing my part to keep the country free)
To: marshmallow
A commentary on Iranian radio on Wednesday accused President Bush of seeking to distract attention from America's domestic troubles by going to war with Iraq, So they are in good company, with the socialists of Germany and the socialists of America's Democrat Party, who all make the same argument.
10
posted on
01/29/2003 4:05:50 PM PST
by
copycat
(Ridicule Hillary!™ to someone you know TODAY!!)
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: ThomasJefferson
My vote is Canada.
To: marshmallow
Stuff it, Iran. Keep your filthy hands to yourself and then maybe we'll talk.
Regards, Ivan
13
posted on
01/29/2003 4:08:07 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: Mr. Lucky
Well, they are close, so it won't cost as much.
To: txradioguy
Then we deal with DPRK. When we deal with them from a position of strentgh, it will make the ChiComs think twice about pulling anything funny in the Formosa Strait.Hmmm,, sounds like a lot of wars in a row. Who's after that?
To: exnavy
Dear Mr Kharrazi. Want some advice? Here's some: You shouldn't have f***** with our embassy in 1979, because we have a long memory and payback's a bitch.
To: Mr. Lucky
"My vote is Canada"
There's no sport in that. There entire military numbers only 55K. We'll just cut orders for the 49th Armored Division (Texas Army National Guard)to move out from Ft. Hood and take care of Canada while the full time guys take care of the more "important" issues in the world.
17
posted on
01/29/2003 4:10:18 PM PST
by
txradioguy
(Doing my part to keep the country free)
To: marshmallow
Mr Kharrazi replied that: "The Iranian nation does not need to get advice from outside." Losers never get to voice an opinion.
This is specially true is in the world of Dar al Islam...
You lost decisively in 1992; Deal with it.
To: ThomasJefferson
I'm not saying war with the DPRK or the Chi Coms. But after Iraq our military will be primed. Along with our allies we will have done what we were told couldn't be done. Peace through strength will make a triumphant return to the word stage. We can tell the DPRK, China et. al. not to mess with us and our friends or they'll end up like Iraq. And they'll know that we mean it. Unlike the "all talk no action" policy from 1993 - 2001.
19
posted on
01/29/2003 4:13:35 PM PST
by
txradioguy
(Doing my part to keep the country free)
To: txradioguy
But after Iraq our military will be primed. We will be stronger after we have used up a good part of our munitions?
We can tell the DPRK, China et. al. not to mess with us and our friends or they'll end up like Iraq.
China is a nuclear power. Brinks-man-ship with them is a tad different.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson