Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hchutch
If that report is so credible, why isn't the Administration touting it?

What you're left with is the flimsiest of circumstantial cases: i.e., since Mohammed Atta is reported to have met with unnamed Iraqi intelligence officers, therefore Iraq must have helped the terrorists plan 9-11. That sort of flimsy circumstantial evidence wouldn't convict someone of a speeding ticket, much less serve as a basis for invading a sovereign nation.

By the same token, there's much more evidence that the 9-11 terrorists were directly financed by individuals within the Saudi government. When do we march on Riyahd?

10 posted on 01/29/2003 8:36:15 AM PST by Aristophanes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Aristophanes; Poohbah
Well, let's look at this item from the London Observer:
http://www.observer.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4296646,00.html

In addition to said meeting with Mr. al-Ani (the London Observer gave it as Muhammed, most others have given the name as Ahmed), we've got Salman Pak, where the same method of hijacking airlinera as wa sused on 9/11 was taught.
12 posted on 01/29/2003 9:01:29 AM PST by hchutch ("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson