Skip to comments.
Homicide victims usually know killer
The Modesto Bee ^
| Posted: January 28, 2003 @ 04:50:10 AM PST
| Patick Giblin
Posted on 01/28/2003 5:13:29 AM PST by runningbear
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 501-514 next last
To: spectre
LOL! Dads, step-Dads, who's married to who..THIS is one blended family situation.Not so! It could be worse. There are SOME families around this area where if you looked closely you could find an "uncle-daddy" or two.
381
posted on
01/28/2003 2:52:50 PM PST
by
alexandria
("You are NOW posting a message on FR. Do you know where YOUR moral compass is?)
To: Rheo
Of course, as usual, your points are right on.
I am only speculating how the average pregnant person would react to the news their husband was screwing around. There are, those women who would put up a good front, tho, protecting their husbands and marriage from the wrath of their family. Once a wife smears her husband to the family, especially saying he had an affair, they never look at him the same way again.
All the things we have talked about, that are possible motives for Scott to kill Laci, don't amount to a hill of beans. It doesn't prove he did it, only that he is suspect. So, he lied? Unfortunately, so what? Proves only that he lied.
IF they don't have forensic evidence to link Scott to a "dead Laci", then he walks.
Now, if they find her body enclosed in one of their suitcases, or one of his home-made weights attached to it, then Scott is busted. Tough case.
sw
382
posted on
01/28/2003 2:59:53 PM PST
by
spectre
(spectre's wife (Hire Mark Fuhrman))
To: alexandria
"Uncle Daddy"...
BAWHAHAHAHAH!sw
383
posted on
01/28/2003 3:02:57 PM PST
by
spectre
(spectre's wife (My moral compass is on the GWB SOTU Threads..))
To: spectre
Now, if they find her body enclosed in one of their suitcases, or one of his home-made weights attached to it, then Scott is busted.As stupid as he appears so far...that could happen!......now step away from those Soprano DVD's!..lol
384
posted on
01/28/2003 3:03:42 PM PST
by
Rheo
To: alexandria
But I have to cringe when it is suggested that because Laci was pregnant, Scott's "needs" had to be met elsewhere. I hope no one got the wrong impression about one of my posts either!
I in no way was condoning men who stray when their wives are pregnant, only addressing the issue that there's a possibility that this could have been going on here.
To: spectre
#385 should probably have gone to you, spec.
To: Queen Jadis
My Vote is it was a "Freudian Slip" he cannot "approach" the subject? That is the same thing I thought when I heard it. That boy has alot to hide.
387
posted on
01/28/2003 3:16:37 PM PST
by
Yeti
(I think that's fair.)
To: Yeti
Oh, for heaven's sake, you're starting to get semantical. What I mean by "your" theory, is that it is one that you are mulling for possibilities. I certainly didn't think you created it or anything.
Okay. But if one of "my" four theories turns out to be right, I get to do the Yeti vicory dance, and you have post over and over how smart I am.
Only if the "winning theory" isn't the one where Scott turns out to have done it, because that's also "mine." As a matter of fact, I have some scenarios involving Scott:
1. Scott did it--premeditated murder, with or without an accomplice but if there is an accomplice, the accomplice is only helping him cover up--an accessory after the fact, if you will.
2. Scott did it--unpremeditated murder, with or without an accomplice.
3. Insurance money not primary motive but may be a factor.
4. At least one or two more women will pop up out of nowhere, likely one of them Laci's friends.
If Scott turns out to have done it, you don't get to do your victory dance, and you must acknowledge that I was right. If it's somebody else, you get to do the full Church Lady Superior Dance, and I will post at least once how smart you were for thinking outside the box.
388
posted on
01/28/2003 3:18:01 PM PST
by
wimpycat
(Hands off my Moral Compass!)
To: texasbluebell
I in no way was condoning men who stray when their wives are pregnant, only addressing the issue that there's a possibility that this could have been going on here. I am gonna quit defending myself on that one, too. There was nothing in the original post, or anywhere on this thread, where you or I or anyone indicated that was a proper thing to do -- just that it could have been going on.
I don't understand why *some people* think that just because a pregnant woman gains weight, a man can punch her in the stomach and call her fat. Maybe in some people's world it's okay like that, but I take a dim view of it and I can't help but *cringe* when women advocate that kind of brutality against women. What a horrible person.
389
posted on
01/28/2003 3:28:18 PM PST
by
Yeti
(No names, but her initials are S.W.)
To: Yeti
OMG, what are you saying I said?
Say it again, and explain yourself. Make it good.
390
posted on
01/28/2003 3:36:32 PM PST
by
spectre
(spectre's wife)
To: spectre
My thoughts exactly!
To: wimpycat
If Scott turns out to have done it, you don't get to do your victory dance, and you must acknowledge that I was right. If it's somebody else, you get to do the full Church Lady Superior Dance, and I will post at least once how smart you were for thinking outside the box. Okay, but since I think Scott probably did it or had it done, I think I should still get something if he did it.
Can I maybe do something like a little "I considered that!" strut?
392
posted on
01/28/2003 3:38:37 PM PST
by
Yeti
(Now offerring surgically implanted moral GPS chips at a discount!)
To: Yeti
What??? I haven't seen *anyone* here advocate brutality against women, ever.
393
posted on
01/28/2003 3:39:22 PM PST
by
Velveeta
((Please sign the Missing Adult Alert petition! http://www.PetitionOnline.com/adalert/)
To: spectre
I am actually trying to mirror your implications about what I said, and I think you know that, SW.
394
posted on
01/28/2003 3:40:20 PM PST
by
Yeti
(Now offerring surgically implanted moral GPS chips at a discount!)
To: Yeti
I'm asking you to explain yourself, Yeti! I want to hear how I am an ADVOCATE for men punching pregnant, fat women in the stomach.
Explain yourself!
sw
395
posted on
01/28/2003 3:41:45 PM PST
by
spectre
(spectre's wife)
To: wimpycat
Just want to step up and say not everyone who thinks Scott is most likely the "perp" has jumped on the bandwagon willingly from the gitgo. At first, I was even thinking it was possible she was kidnapped for the baby, as those cases seem to be popping up more and more, strange as it seems.
No, Scott has risen to the top of my list by my logical reasoning. That doesn't mean anyone else has to share it, nor does it have to thrust down anyone's throat. That said, I'd prefer not to nominated or lumped in to any "wife-killing" groups, thank you very much. I just feel at this stage, with what is known, that Scott has failed to remove himself from being the top suspect.
To: Yeti
Consider it done, but it will have to be mutual.
397
posted on
01/28/2003 3:42:12 PM PST
by
wimpycat
(Hands off my Moral Compass!)
To: Velveeta
I haven't seen anyone advocate men sleeping with other women when their wives are pregnant, either.
But some people seem apalled at precisely that.
398
posted on
01/28/2003 3:42:19 PM PST
by
Yeti
(tit for tat)
To: Rusty Roberts
Yep!
399
posted on
01/28/2003 3:43:10 PM PST
by
wimpycat
(Rusty is eyeing my Moral Compass!)
To: Yeti
"Mirror" them? You sick pervert.
Suggesting that a man has to fulfill his needs elsewhere if he isn't getting it at home from a pregnant wife, is what YOU suggested.
YOU have the nerve to call me a horrible person? ROTFLMAO!
400
posted on
01/28/2003 3:44:49 PM PST
by
spectre
(spectre's wife)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 501-514 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson