Posted on 01/27/2003 6:46:13 PM PST by TLBSHOW
Why We Must Act Before It Is Too Late
As drums of war are heard across the globe, the March issue of NewsMax Magazine focuses on the growing threat of North Korea.
Shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks, NewsMax.com published an interview with Gen. John Singlaub and Adm. Thomas Moorer. Both of these former senior American military commanders issued important warnings for the future of the U.S.
Their first advice was that President Bush should move quickly to military secure the Panama Canal, over which China had been given operational control. Second, Singlaub and Moorer warned that conflict with North Korea was likely in the near future.
As Gen. Singlaub explained to NewsMax in late 2001, he had little doubt that North Korea, headed by madman Kim Jong Il, would seize the opportunity and threaten war if the U.S. got mired down in a Middle Eastern war.
Singlaub’s prediction about North Korea was not a shot in the blue. He had served as chief of staff of U.S. forces in Korea during the 1970s and has carefully monitored Korea since.
Soon after NewsMax’s interview with Moorer and Singlaub appeared, the Pentagon did indeed bolster the United States' naval presence in the Panama Canal, signing a new treaty with the Panamanians.
Now Korea has moved to center stage, just as Singlaub and Moorer predicted.
The Korean threat to the United States today underscores President Bush’s warning that unless we deal with rogue nations now while they are comparatively weak, we will have to deal with them tomorrow when they are much stronger.
However, Bush has also kept talk of a Korean crisis muted. This is smart considering we are about to go to war against Iraq, stretching our military resources.
The last thing we need is a two-front war. After Bill Clinton’s draconian military cuts during the 1990s, a two-front war could prove disastrous.
The Koreans are well aware of our military weakness, and that is why they are now saber-rattling, trying to extort billions of dollars in aid, threatening war on the Korean peninsula, and even suggesting that they may use nuclear weapons.
By all accounts, they already have several nuclear weapons and could have more soon. But if that makes them difficult to deal with now, just imagine how difficult it would be to deal with them once they have dozens of nuclear weapons and advanced missiles. They could even have nuclear-armed missiles capable of hitting the continental United States in the next five years.
Picture the current Korean crisis with San Francisco and Los Angeles in the cross hairs. Now you understand why missile defense is vital.
The bottom line: We must deal with Iraq, North Korea and other countries that threaten the United States before it is too late.
Does that mean the U.S. should go to war with these nations?
Only as a last resort. Instead, the U.S. should use its enormous economic and political power to stop, hinder and change rogue nations.
In addition, well-funded and determined U.S. intelligence services, something that was severely corroded during the Clinton years, could help to make the world a safer by taking the proactive steps that make war unnecessary.
But we must move quickly, even when it is difficult for the public to understand why.
Most people don’t appreciate that time is a precious commodity, disappearing before our eyes. But if we do not act while we can from a position of strength in a world where dozens of hostile nations now seek weapons of mass destruction, there may be no second chance for us.
This theme is reinforced by several distinguished writers in the March issue of NewsMax Magazine:
Max Freedman offers a penetrating review of a new book that interestingly illustrates my point about not waiting to act.
In his penetrating biography of the famous educator and psychologist, “Rising to the Light: A Portrait of Bruno Bettelheim,” Theron Raines details Bettelheim’s years in Austria, as the Nazis took power and Jews were systematically plundered and sent to the concentration camps.
Bettelheim ended up in Buchenwald and Dachau, like millions of other Jews. Later he admitted that he saw all the warning signs about the Nazis and their imminent danger, yet he and most people did not take decisive action.
Fortunately, Bettelheim was released from Buchenwald shortly before the outbreak of World War II and was able to immigrate to the United States, where he became a leading child educator in Chicago.
Raines writes of Bettelheim “in his usual way he wrote to teach, to warn his readers once more that carrying on a normal life ‘can be fatal in extreme circumstances.’ In the world he know, those who glorified a passive response to oppression were dangerously out of touch with reality; he also believed that cultural attitudes in part led to the inertia that kept ghetto Jews from trying to defend themselves against the Nazis ...”
Bettelheim’s biography makes it clear that we cannot live in the past when our society is under siege. We cannot afford the fantasy believing there is any guarantee the future will be as pleasant as the past, if we simply close our eyes to reality.
Indeed, after Sept. 11, we all live in a new world that demands from each of us greater responsibility, greater awareness, and more forceful action to stop the new evils which threaten us all.
China has no such thing. They do not have a military presence there and they have no means to project one there. Good grief, they can't even project a credible threat against Taiwan.
Once again from the top...It is TWO DOCKS this Chinese company is building and will operate for a while. Top management of the company is BRITISH and the workers are PANAMANIANS.
Are you in a position to be privy to more complete and accurate information than these two gentleman?
The last times Adm. Moore came through here (about three years ago) he could barely walk and think. He is very old.
Well, since you know so much, can you verify what's stated above? Was there an increase in Naval presence at that time? If so, what were the true reasons for the buildup? Did the U.S. really sign a new treaty with the Panamanians? If so why and what was the nature of that treaty?
Thank you for educating the 'gullible' here in the States and clearing this up for me.
2. There is no U.S. Naval presence in Panama. There is no longer a base for the navy to stay.
3. I'm bored with your ignorance.
I never said the military signed any treaty, nor did the article. In fact I'm not saying anything from personal knowledge, only what the article is saying through an interview, and questioning why you dispute what veteran military officers are saying.
Simply living in Panama hardly gives you automatic credibility for what's going on there with regard to American national security issues. Also, if you truly did know what you were talking about, you wouldn't resort to name calling and demeaning statements.
And how many shipping containers could these 'buildings' house??? And tell us Mr Gatun, do you think any missiles or missile parts could be in said containers?
[To put it in simple layman terms Mr Gatun, do you think the COMMUNIST Chinese haven't thought about placing missiles and or missile parts in containers on the base or bases that these building are being constructed on?)
I wonder if the Communist Chinese and North Korean leaders have given any thought to placing nuclear bombs in shipping containers (or assorted parts for such in several different containers)...and have such containers stored at their bases in Panama? Nah, surely they wouldn't think of doing that. Nah. [hence, no reason for Bush to force the COMMUNIST Chinese out of Panama....nah]????
I may be wrong, but IMHO, Red China is behind this. Reading BETRAYAL, by Bill Gertz, it seems logical to me that this might be part of Red Chinas strategy in its continuing build up for a war with the US, along with it agressive nuclear strategy which includes land based ICBMs, submarine based ICBMs and purchase of naval vessels to counter our aircraft carriers......
Kook.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.