Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
Also, if it ratified by the individual States then those State legislatures approve of the measure. If not, why would they have voted in the affirmative.

Not begging in anyone's mind other than a gun-grabbing socialist like yourself.

78 posted on 01/27/2003 12:44:06 PM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
Also, if it ratified by the individual States then those State legislatures approve of the measure.

As a restriction on the powers delegated.

"But it is universally understood, it is a part of the history of the day, that the great revolution which established the constitution of the United States, was not effected without immense opposition. Serious fears were extensively entertained that those powers which the patriot statesmen, who then watched over the interests of our country, deemed essential to union, and to the attainment of those invaluable objects for which union was sought, might be exercised in a manner dangerous to liberty. In almost every convention by which the constitution was adopted, amendments to guard against the abuse of power were recommended. These amendments demanded security against the apprehended encroachments of the general government--not against those of the local governments." -- Barron v. Baltimore, 7 Pet. 243 1833

Historical ignorance is a poor basis for forming opinions.

81 posted on 01/27/2003 12:57:51 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson