Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
Roscoe. You keep going in circles with this crap. While legally, you may have the right of it. The gods know our legal system is a gordian knot. But Constitutionally and logically you are screwed.

The Pre-amble to the BOR is all the incorperation it requires. Because pin-heads keep trying to undercut it, they even added a couple of Amendments to try and clarify it for people just like you. Still you refuse to see.

Let's look at it this way. Who owns you? I claim that I have ownership of myself. Keeping myself alive is protecting my "property". Unless you advocate having someone in government breath, eat, and defecate for me, then protecting my life is something very personal that it is my responsibility to see to. A firearm is one of the better tools out there to use for that protection. If you deny me those tools, then you assume ownership and responsibility for me. I don't need your, or anyone elses permission to do so. No permits nor licensing.

As I am NOT you g@dd@mn slave, you can leave my firearms alone. Reasonable restrictions? By whose standard? The Majorities? what if the Majority decided you needed to die to protect the rest of us? Would you be so sanguine about it then?

67 posted on 01/27/2003 12:17:56 PM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
The Pre-amble to the BOR is all the incorperation it requires.

False.

The Preamble to The Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

The Constitution delegates powers to the federal government. The Preamble states that the Bill of Rights was written to prevent misconstruction or abuse of those delegated federal powers.

"But it is universally understood, it is a part of the history of the day, that the great revolution which established the constitution of the United States, was not effected without immense opposition. Serious fears were extensively entertained that those powers which the patriot statesmen, who then watched over the interests of our country, deemed essential to union, and to the attainment of those invaluable objects for which union was sought, might be exercised in a manner dangerous to liberty. In almost every convention by which the constitution was adopted, amendments to guard against the abuse of power were recommended. These amendments demanded security against the apprehended encroachments of the general government--not against those of the local governments." -- Barron v. Baltimore, 7 Pet. 243 1833

70 posted on 01/27/2003 12:28:05 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson