[Shooter 2.5]

3. he reasonably believes that:

A. the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or

[WL-law]

3. he reasonably believes that:

A. the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or

you cite this part of the statute, but the other parts are connected by "ANDS", not "ORS", so this is not a stand-alone basis to assert lethal force -- every part of the statute must be satisfied for the right to attach. I suggest you re-read with that in mind.