[Shooter 2.5]

"the defense of property, although strongly protected under the law, does not by itself EVER justify the taking of another's life. Period.

Under Texas law, a person can protect their property with deadly force if there is the chance the property can never be recovered. Absolute statements about the law between different locales is a risky business.

[WL-law]

Under Texas law, a person can protect their property with deadly force if there is the chance the property can never be recovered. Absolute statements about the law between different locales is a risky business.

Prove it. Where is the cite? And -- is it still good law, or something from cattle-rustling days?