[Shooter 2.5]

The physical evidence should have proven the facts without this ever going to trial.

Would you prosecute a woman attacked in her bed who shoots a career rapist only because her word was the only testimony?

[WL-law]

The physical evidence should have proven the facts without this ever going to trial.

Would you prosecute a woman attacked in her bed who shoots a career rapist only because her word was the only testimony?

Obviously I don't agree. Your hypo is significantly different than the facts at hand. "In bed" means "in residence", the ability to defend with non-lethal force is drastically different -- so I suggest you try me again with a better example.