Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WL-law
They weren't defending their homes, by the way, where a different set of presumptions regarding deadly force might apply.

I don't see what difference it makes how they chose to use their property--whether for construction, storage, or sleeping. All that matters is that it was their property.

20 posted on 01/26/2003 9:33:57 AM PST by beavus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: beavus
I don't see what difference it makes how they chose to use their property--whether for construction, storage, or sleeping. All that matters is that it was their property.

You don't know, apparently, the long history of the law on this point. The law makes a huge distinction on moral grounds between your rights to use force, especially lethal force, when protecting YOUR OWN LIFE or the LIFE OF OTHERS versus mere property. I suggest you do a google search and find a nice dissertation on the subject.

22 posted on 01/26/2003 10:41:18 AM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson