[WL-law]

What is your fascination with spring guns?

Well, see the post prior to yours. It lays out the moral arguments.

[Double Tap]

For the hundredth time, there was no spring gun used. There is no comparison between what happened in this case and using a spring gun. This whole arguement started over your statement that a person could never use deadly force in defense of property. You have been proven wrong, it is quite legal in Texas.

Your attempt to side track the discussion is only too obvious, and everyone has seen it. Why don't you quit digging deeper and deeper into the hole you have dug for yourself.