To: aristeides
It was Catherine Crier and the judge on this case is NOT the one who worked for Bush in Florida, NOR is the other Crummey. That is the incorrect name. She lied.
235 posted on
01/25/2003 7:27:39 PM PST by
Howlin
(he has friends in high places)
To: Howlin
Whats with the "Scotts" of the world? They think they will get off Scott free?
238 posted on
01/25/2003 7:32:06 PM PST by
woofie
To: Howlin
What bothers me about what Crier said and Ritter's claim that it was a VRWC is that NOBODY forced Scott Ritter to log on to the chat room, NOBODY forced Scott Ritter to arrange a meeting with a girl he knew was a minor, NOBODY forced Scott Ritter to drive to the Burger King.
What's lost here is that Scott Ritter is a demented child predator. It's so typical of the left to ignore the real problem and try to paint themselves as some kind of victims because their dirty laundry gets aired. IMHO Crier is completely incompetent. To ignore the fact that Scott Ritter took it upon himself to use his keyboard and his Internet connection to lure a child into meeting him with the expectations of a sexual encounter is irresponsible and reprehensible. There is no limit on how low the leftist media will go in order to protect the rapist, pedophiles, and sexual predators that make up their ideology. These people are lacking a soul PERIOD
250 posted on
01/25/2003 7:48:49 PM PST by
MJY1288
("This looks like a rerun of a bad movie and I'm not interested in watching it.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson