Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sam_paine
I once did some quick research on the question of the proper usage of "bold-faced" vs. "bald-faced" (because I was wondering whether it was more correct to say "Bill Clinton is a bold-faced liar" or "Bill Clinton is a bald-faced liar"). My conclusion was that the most correct statement would have been "Bill Clinton is a despicable, lying, treasonous rapist". Oh, but I digress. My other conclusion was that the term "bold-faced" has been in the language for a long time. The word "barefaced" has also been in the language for a long time. And, it appears that the term "bald-faced" may have been derived more recently as a combination of the two (but meaning essentially the same thing), but indeed it has entered the language, and so all of them are valid.
121 posted on 01/25/2003 5:28:41 PM PST by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: The Electrician
... but indeed it has entered the language, and so all of them are valid.

I suppose that's how language melts into the blob.

148 posted on 01/25/2003 6:07:28 PM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson