Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

**US MAY USE TATICAL NUKES IN IRAQ**
LA Times and Times of India ^ | January 25, 2003 | William Arkin

Posted on 01/25/2003 6:43:36 AM PST by ewing

The United States is quietly preparing for the use of tatical nuclear weapons in a war against Iraq and military planners have been actively studying lists of potential targets, the media reported Saturday.

The preparations include possible use of so called 'bunker buster' nuclear weapons against deeply buried military targets the Los Angeles Times reported on Saturday morning quoting William M. Arkin.

Defence officials have been focusing their plans on the use of tatical nuclear arms in retaliation for a strike by the Iraqis with chemical or biological weapons, or to preempt one, the daily said.

US Administration officials believe that in some circumstances, using nuclear arms may be the only way to destory deeply buried targets that may contain unconventional weapons, the report said.

Some officials have argued that the blast and radiation of effect of such strikes would be limited.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesofindia.indiatimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: boom; bunkerbusters; iraq; mindgames; newweapons; saddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last
More psy ops on Saddam?
1 posted on 01/25/2003 6:43:36 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ewing
I think so - but I also think every word is accurate. We are surely prepared for any contingency... not the least likely of which is Saddam's use of WMD. Our response will be devastatingly precise and effective.
2 posted on 01/25/2003 6:46:24 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Seems this same story was circulated almost word for word at the beginning of the Afghan Campaign also.

The LA SLIMES and company are doing their best to try and paint this as some startling and troubling development, when the fact of the matter is that Every campaign is designed with the use of ALL weapons factored in as contingencies.

Also, we have had a "Respond in Kind" policy for the use of WMD for years. You use a WMD on us, we drop a nuke on you - quid pro quo.

3 posted on 01/25/2003 6:48:30 AM PST by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
I don't think that's psyops. I think the gov't is just letting the bad guys know that we are serious about retalliation.

If Iraq pulls a domestic attack through sleepers or hits our troops in the field with WMD, they are just reiterating our ability to field and to use a nuke.

After all, if we are hit with WMD, you would expect an escalation in our military response, but we don't use biologics or chemicals. So, tactical nukes are the only response.
4 posted on 01/25/2003 6:50:17 AM PST by bonesmccoy (Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Good development. Try not to use them in densely populated areas unless Iraq uses WMD first.

Our enemies aren't afraid of us. Political correctness has rendered us impotent. This development is a nice move towards strikign fear in the hearts of Jihadists everywhere.

5 posted on 01/25/2003 6:50:20 AM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: commish
Did we say 'pre emptive' strike during the beginning of the Afghan campaign as well?
6 posted on 01/25/2003 6:53:41 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Picture me using the E-Times (both LA and India) in my E-Birdcage and to wrap my E-Fish.
7 posted on 01/25/2003 6:54:30 AM PST by Mike Darancette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
That should be used first I would think and we don't send any of our boys in just NUKE IRAQ!
8 posted on 01/25/2003 6:55:42 AM PST by TLBSHOW (Slamming the liberal bias media but GOOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Just GWB getting the word out to Saddam. It accomplishes several objectives with one stroke. It will smoke out more hidden aQ rats than we can imagine.

(Someone just tried to hack into my computer as I typed that last sentence .... amazing! Thank God I have good software. Think DNC hackers and crackers are lurking on Free Republic more and more now that they see the site flourishing. Gonna log off right now.)

9 posted on 01/25/2003 7:01:10 AM PST by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
we don't send any of our boys in just NUKE IRAQ!

Ditto that, the Islamists problem could been solved on 9-12-2001 if we had nuked the deserving nations.

10 posted on 01/25/2003 7:01:15 AM PST by putupon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
Nukes in response to WMD attack seems reasonable to me, eh Mr. Bill? :O)
11 posted on 01/25/2003 7:01:36 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
We're not trying to slaughter Iraqi civilians. Just like Afghanistan, we'll attack surgically to minimize civilian casualties.
12 posted on 01/25/2003 7:03:09 AM PST by kristinn (HumanShieldAgainstTerrorists@WhiteHouse.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I think the rest of the world would kind of frown on us nuking Saddam pre emptively.

We already have an EMT/Electromagnetic Pulse bomb that will destroy every computer and electronic circut in Baghdad and make it inoperable for the next 1,000 years..I would use that first!

13 posted on 01/25/2003 7:03:19 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ewing
I do believe this story broke last MArch that we would use nukes if needed!
14 posted on 01/25/2003 7:04:24 AM PST by TLBSHOW (Slamming the liberal bias media but GOOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ewing
The last paragraph of this article sounds good to me:

A White House spokesman declined to comment on Friday on Arkin's report, except to say that "the US reserves the right to defend itself and its allies by whatever means necessary."

15 posted on 01/25/2003 7:04:44 AM PST by kristinn (HumanShieldAgainstTerrorists@WhiteHouse.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
The preparations include possible use of so called 'bunker buster' nuclear weapons...

It's my understanding that "bunker busters" are not nuclear weapons.

16 posted on 01/25/2003 7:06:05 AM PST by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
I do have a even better plan ( Iraq surrenders)! But that would be a perfect world!
17 posted on 01/25/2003 7:06:11 AM PST by TLBSHOW (Slamming the liberal bias media but GOOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
The Nancies over at DUh.com are peeing their pants over this one.
18 posted on 01/25/2003 7:06:13 AM PST by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Im confused by that statement that we would use small nuke bunker busters to pre empt a chemical weapons strike.

Is our intel that good that we would know in advance that a massive bio attack is coming?

19 posted on 01/25/2003 7:06:40 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ewing
world would kind of frown on us

what is the world doing now? they hate us anyway.

20 posted on 01/25/2003 7:07:58 AM PST by putupon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson