Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG
Repeating a lie three times doesnt make it true. you continue to lie.

If anybody is a liar,it is you.

Fact: US gave no money to bin laden.

Pretty selective view,ain't it? No,we didn't give bin Laden any money. We did give him other support and training,though.

Fact: Saddam is the one reponsible for his own WMD programs, his own genocide against Iraqi minority peoples and his own support for terrorists.

Who has said any different,the voices in your head? The fact that he is responsible for his own actions does NOT mean that he did all this on his own without help or support from outside sources.

67 posted on 01/26/2003 1:26:08 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: sneakypete
I know that I'm going to be sorry I replied to you, sneaky ; however, the facts are these: the USA ( in any way, manner, or form ) didn't train bin Laden, they gave him, specifically, no support, and during the Russo/Afghan War, bin Laden just gave money to the " cause ". He, himself, unlike Omar and others, who later became members/ leaders of al Qaeda, never took any part in the conflict against Russia. Those are the facts.

Just because it suits your agenda to say certain things, doesn't make them true, factual, nor germaine.

69 posted on 01/26/2003 1:30:56 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: sneakypete
Me: You are wrong. The US never gave money to bin laden nor al quaeda.


You: Yes,we did.
----

Me: Repeating a lie three times doesnt make it true. you continue to lie.

You: If anybody is a liar,it is you.

Me: Fact: US gave no money to bin laden.


Finally you: Pretty selective view,ain't it? No,we didn't give bin Laden any money. We did give him other support and training,though.




So, first you insist that 'yes we did' then you admit "no we didnt give bin laden money" ... now you have fallen back to the (still false) "we gave him training" ... no we didnt give Bin Laden anything.

If you havent quite grabbed the clue here and have bought the phony "blowback" stories I am sorry, but its is wrong. Bin Laden was another FUNDER of Afghan mujahadeen, not a part of it, and Al Quaeda didnt even exist during the Afghan war against USSR. Our support for the Afghan mujahideen does *not* mean we supported other funders/fellow-travellers of the Afghan resistence effort. The USA gave nothing to either Bin Laden directly nor to Al Quaeda. Nor does it mean we sponsored in any way shape or form any activities after the ejection of USSR from Afghanistan.

The original comment you made, in reply #48, was a slander against Bush-1.

You: "Why don't you write of Bush-1's sponsorship of terror and bin Laden,Al Quaeda,etc? Hell,they pre-date those of Saddam."

You have yet to give even a hint of evidence for this calumny. We did not "sponsor terror" in any shape or form
wrt OBL or Al Quaeda. we gave them no money, no training, no support of any kind.

This is clearly a non-productive debate, as you are changing your story to suit whatever agenda you are
trying to peddle, which IMHO seems to solely consist of disparaging Bush and USA with defamatory comments.
73 posted on 01/26/2003 2:02:34 AM PST by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson