Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: glorgau
I don't see why Mcclintock tipped his hand.

McClintock has nicely trapped the Dems. The Car Tax increase was the one significant "revenue enhancement" that arguably did not require a 2/3 majority vote, and which the Democrats could therefore pass without the support of any Republicans. They wanted to use that to bargain with the Republicans for a compromise: Higher taxes elsewhere (e.g., on sales or income) and minimal spending cuts.

Now McClintock has effectively eviscerated the Democrats' bargaining position. He's told them that they can't raise the Car Tax. If they try, they still won't get any new revenues to cover this year's budget deficit, and they'll be horribly embarrassed when the voters swat them down at the next election. So their only option is to cut spending to balance the budget, and that is the thing they hate the most.

16 posted on 01/24/2003 6:25:11 PM PST by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: dpwiener
McClintock's statements were the first I've heard about this. I wonder if this is the first public announcement of this strategy. I'll be interested to see if it gets any ink in tomorrow's papers.
17 posted on 01/24/2003 6:35:06 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson