Posted on 01/24/2003 9:51:31 AM PST by Remedy
Western values are by no means secure. They're under ruthless attack by the academic elite on college campuses across America. These people want to replace personal liberty with government control; they want to replace equality with entitlement; they want to halt progress in the name of protecting the environment. As such, they pose a much greater threat to our way of life than any terrorist or rogue nation. Multiculturalism and diversity are a cancer on our society, and, ironically, with our tax dollars and charitable donations, we're feeding it.
Multiculturalism and the Fall of Western Civilization
...The Founding Fathers saw diversity as a reality and as a problem: hence the national motto: e pluribus unum, chosen by a committee of he Continental Congress consisting of Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams. Later political leaders who also were fearful of the dangers of racial, sectional, economic, and cultural diversity (which indeed, produced the largest war of the century between 1815 and 1914), responded to the call of "bring us together," and made the promotion of national unity their central responsibility. "The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of of its continuing as a nation at all," warned Theodore Roosevelt, "would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities." In the 1990s, however, leaders of he United States have not only permitted that but assiduously promoted the diversity rather than the unity of the people they govern.
A multicivilizational United states will not be the United States; it will be the United Nations.
SYMPOSIUM Q: Is Multiculturalism a Threat to the National Security of the United States?
The basic message of "multiculturalism" is that all cultures are equally good and beneficent — except Western culture, which is violent and oppressive.
Disarmament through psychological conditioning takes place endlessly in America's public schools, colleges and universities and, most powerfully, in the products of the entertainment industry, which now is the dominant force in American culture. The result is evident: While many average Americans recognize American Muslims as a dangerous fifth column, the multiculturalist elite demands a "tolerance of diversity" that Islam itself does not know. A Republican administration invites mullahs to the White House to celebrate Islamic holidays.
On the one side are the forces of fourth-generation war, led by Islam. Arrayed against them are the final dregs of the modern age, sometimes called the New World Order but more accurately named Brave New World. The latter combines the anti-Western ideology of cultural Marxism with manipulative technologies: the virtual realities of the video screen, mind-altering drugs (Ritalin is soma for kids) and, most dangerous of all, genetic engineering. While each of these contenders is bitterly hostile to the other, they agree on one thing: Western culture's got to go. The 21st century promises to be an interesting time.
The Multicultural Theocracy: An Interview With Paul Gottfried
What are the prospects for containing or rolling back the multicultural theocracy?
Note I do not think these battles will solve long-term problems; unless Western peoples start having families again, the social unit and population base needed for a civilization will be lacking.
While societies can assimilate, there are three presuppositions that must obtain: a core population that carries a distinctive culture that it hopes to preserve; a minority that is accepted on the condition that it eagerly embraces that majority culture; and a sufficiently controlled immigration so that assimilation is possible.
Hear that, mass immivasion enthusiasts? It's the truth. No ifs, ands, or buts. That is what is happening NOW.
Want the U.S. to end up being the dog that gets wagged by the tail in Mexico (i.e., the corrupt, despicable Mexican oligarchy)?
I think this is indicative of a much deeper problem, namely that a lot of American high school and college students do not learn and do not carry American values as well any more.
Thanks to "Social Studies", ie; US History, US Constitution courses, replaced by Global Sing-a-longs.
I think that if the right man campaigned for President on a platform strong on American sovereignty, tight borders and deportation of illegal aliens, he would win in a landslide. I think most Americans are fed up with what is happening to our country because of open borders.
Although I agree on many of those issues, single-issue candidates typically do not fare well in Presidential elections. But if a candidate ran on those issues plus restrictions on H1-B visas AND other labor issues, as well as health care reform, they might win. However, it would probably be an old-school Democrat running such a campaign.
Looks like the "Anti-America" Open Borders Cabal are trying to find a way to legalize high treason. And you know what, given their treasonous set of politics, I can see why.
You're right, he would have to be strong on other major issues.
I agree, it isn't just the Dems anymore. Both parties ignore their constituents in favor of this immigration madness. I lost faith in George Bush when he didn't close the borders on September 12.
That's why I believe the immigration nightmare in America will continue until a 3rd party candidate that runs on a platform of putting the interests of America and her people FIRST wins the presidency. Absent that, it's more of the same until America is no longer America. The Beltway Parties are too thoroughly corrupt and entrenched to change their well-worn path of treason.
No kiddin', only liberals would dream about the overseas powers and not the truth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.